Q: Will my insurance benefits change after the vote?
A: No. All Flight Attendants (pmAS and pmVX) are already on the same insurance programs.
See also JNC blog: “Healthcare Insurance” >
Association of Flight Attendants-CWA Alaska Airlines Master Executive Council
Q: Will my insurance benefits change after the vote?
A: No. All Flight Attendants (pmAS and pmVX) are already on the same insurance programs.
See also JNC blog: “Healthcare Insurance” >
Q: If the TA is approved, our seniorities will be based on the last three digits of our Peoplesoft number if we started on the same day. I am VX. So, if I’m #3 in my class right now, I could get dropped down to #30 based on the last three digits of my Peoplesoft number, correct? And why are we using Peoplesoft numbers as a tiebreaker? Can we use birthdays like many other airlines?
A: The provision you are referencing is only for new-hires on a go-forward basis following ratification. No Flight Attendant already on the payroll will experience a change in relative seniority as a result of this merger (i.e. no reshuffling of seniority numbers within one’s class). AFA is moving away from using birth dates for determining seniority on a go-forward basis (i.e. for new hire classes after ratification) out of an abundance of caution. Recent legislation in certain localities may be problematic for continuing the practice of having the oldest trainee in a class to be the most senior and the youngest to be the most junior.
Q1: Why are AFA officers getting big raises when the rest of us are getting only 4.5%? LECPs 10 TFP/month and MECP 11.8TFP/month, etc., which is far more than my 4.5% as a Flight Attendant? Is this increase a way to pay our AFA officers off to put this out for a vote?
Q2: I understand work done by our LEC Officers is for all AFA members, but our Officers just received a healthy pay increase in this last contract as did the lower part of the seniority list. Why would our Officers who work for us, the members, again receive (ask for/be offered?)–and more importantly accept–a larger increase in TFP pay than the senior FAs on both proposed TAs (TA2 in 2014 & current TA) when this Merger TA is only able to make a few improvements (e.g. “TA2 regrets”)?
A: The JNC strongly advocated for more pay for senior Flight Attendants–particularly by increasing the Longevity Premium. That was one of the final items pulled from the table to reach a TA. Management refused and refused to address increases for more senior Flight Attendants. Management was set on putting equal percentage increases in the scale. The JNC pushed several proposals across the table that targeted senior Flight Attendants more favorably, but management pushed back on nearly all of them. The only one that made it into the final TA was the Productivity Premium Program (PPP), which arguably makes it easier for more senior FAs to achieve because of their relatively larger vacation accrual.
Keep in mind that a Reserve receives a 90 TFP guarantee and has 12 guaranteed days off. All of these officers and reps consistently have fewer days off than that in a month and are constantly on call. The JNC believes it is reasonable to bring the LECP FPL up closer to the reserve guarantee and to more closely mirror the line average. Finally, neither the MECP FPL nor the MEC EAP FPL has increased since the mid-2000s, yet the number of members have more than doubled since then due to growth–and now the merger.
The FPL increases are in no way a quid pro quo for putting the TA out for a vote. Increasing the Company Business FPL for these positions shifts the financial burden of paying for these positions from the union funds (i.e. from members’ dues dollars) to the Company; this frees up members’ dues money for other member-directed activities. The increases are included in the TA in the interest of full transparency. If any member has additional questions or concerns, we encourage to you to reach out to your respective LEC president.
Q: Will the $75 monthly parking stipend be paid in a manner that makes it subject to federal income tax?
A: Yes, the parking stipend will be subject to federal income tax, which is the current application for a similar program at L-VX. However, ground commuters could help offset the tax by making before-tax contributions to the commute trip reduction program.
Q: I read this on social media. Is it in fact true the Company is not allowed to limit a medical leave to one year because of a lawsuit as this states so we will get the medical leave extension even if we vote this down? Is it true that the current 1-year medical leave would be changed to four years regardless of whether this TA passes or not. There was a huge lawsuit in California and I believe a couple other states against the airlines who had one year medical leave policies they lost. Is it true that the company legally cannot make a medical leave one year?
A: No. There is no law that AFA is aware of that eliminates a medical leave in duration of one year. However, the case that we believe you reference had to do with ADA compliance and the fact that American Airlines would not allow any employees on medical leave to return to work until they were free from any restrictions. The court ruled this practice violates the ADA. Reasonable accommodations are allowed under ADA, so eliminating the possibility of some reasonable accommodation to allow an employee to return is a violation of ADA. It has nothing to do with the duration of the leave.
Our AFA Reserve Committee Chairpersons met on Thursday, June 13, to discuss their ongoing program of work to represent and advocate for our Reserve Flight Attendants. The Committee also met with management to review specific concerns that Flight Attendants brought forward. Your Local Reserve Committee is available to answer questions, clarify contractual language, or help resolve reserve-related issues. Please don’t hesitate to reach out!
On June 25, our AFA Scheduling Committee Chairpersons met to discuss their ongoing work representing Flight Attendants’ interests in lineholder scheduling. The Committee met with management to receive updates and discuss issues and problems Flight Attendants face with scheduling, pairings, and bidding. Your Local Scheduling Committee is available to assist with any lineholder scheduling-related issues. Don’t hesitate to reach out for help!
AFA has not agreed to any extra-contractual terms for the newly announced supplemental ditching training; discussions with management just started. Many management decision-makers are away at contract negotiations, delaying progress toward any sort of agreement. Our AFA Committees are committed to advocating for your rights and will address unresolved issues through the contractual grievance process if necessary.
Our AFA Alaska Master Executive Council (MEC) met this week on Monday, June 17, and Tuesday, June 18, to conduct their ongoing work to represent our Flight Attendants. The MEC was supposed to meet with executive management and union leaders from other company workgroups but chose to skip the meeting in support of our Negotiating Committee. The next Regular MEC Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, July 9, and Wednesday, July 10.
Flight Attendants are facing technical issues with Crew Access and Open Time trading/dropping, causing stress and frustration. Management plans to resolve these issues with server upgrades in June and July and will monitor the system closely during July Open Time. Our Scheduling Committee has requested a meeting with management to discuss long-term solutions for the ongoing Crew Access challenges.