Dear Flight Attendants,

Let’s talk about frustration. The Master Executive Council (MEC) is very much aware that you’re frustrated with negotiations. Believe us, the leadership is frustrated, the Negotiating Committee is frustrated…we’re all feeling it. In one week we will have been negotiating for two full years and we’re all beyond ready to have a new contract. Unfortunately, we can’t reach a tentative agreement (TA) until management makes more movement towards our position on several key issues.

This past week the MEC met with CEO Brad Tilden, COO Ben Minicucchi, VP Labor Relations Shane Tackett and VP Inflight Services Andy Schneider. During that meeting AFA leadership made it very clear to management of the importance a 10 ½ hour duty day and pay guarantees (rigs) are to the Membership. Management was naturally somewhat surprised to still be talking about rigs because the Negotiating Committee withdrew rigs (out of frustration) at the end of last session. The MEC expressed AFA’s desire to continue discussions on rigs but this time with AFA input into the vetting process. This would include full access to the pairing optimizer and selection of parameters, pairing months and costing data.

The parties engaged in an open and honest dialogue but did not walk away with firm commitments on either side. AFA left management with a challenge: to view rigs as just another line item with a defined cost rather than continuing to be “philosophically opposed” to these important pay guarantees. It seemed like a lot of talk without concrete results, but we’ll see.

So where to go from here? We keep on keeping on of course! And, as we have been saying, it’s time to turn up the heat! Please mark your calendars for a day of solidarity actions at strategic Flight Attendant domicile airports throughout the system on Thursday, December 19, 2013. More information regarding planned picketing on this day to follow. We will also be asking Seattle Flight Attendants or Flight Attendants on a Seattle layover to participate in a respectful showing of support for the Negotiating Committee on Tuesday, December 10th; this event will be in conjunction with the first day of mediation in Seattle.

Finally, there are troubling rumors on the line about Flight Attendants planning their own unsanctioned solidarity actions in the coming weeks. We absolutely can’t go there and here’s why: AFA and Alaska are currently engaged in contract negotiations under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). While in negotiations neither party can legally engage in any concerted activity—the Union cannot strike or engage in job actions, and management cannot unilaterally change the existing collective bargaining agreement. Individual Flight Attendants who engage in concerted activity will almost certainly be subject to potential discipline up to and including termination of employment. It’s just not worth it!

AFA is committed to the process under Section 6 of the RLA and by law cannot support, encourage or condone any job action by its members while we are in negotiations. If the parties cannot reach agreement on a new contract, AFA will use all available legal means—up to and including CHAOS™—to leverage its members’ solidarity into seeking the best agreement in the airline industry. But that time has not yet arrived.

Until then, AFA asks that you vent your frustrations by attending the events on December 10th and/or 19th if possible. Sign up for participation by filling in the easy form located here: http://alaskamec.org/solidarity-signup. (It’s unnecessary to sign up again if you have recently contacted your LEC president regarding solidarity opportunities.)

Additional questions or concerns? Go here: http://alaskamec.org/contact-us/.

In solidarity,

Your MEC – Jeffrey Peterson, Terry Taylor, Yvette Gesch, Melanie Buker, Laura Masserant, Cathy Gwynn and Sandra Morrow

Dear Flight Attendants,

To say that this week was frustrating and disappointing is an understatement. We came to this fifth mediation session in San Diego with the intent of working hard and getting very close on the remaining short list of items now on the bargaining table.

In an effort to secure industry-leading trip and duty rigs, we proposed a limited application of a duty day of up to 12 ½ hours and not to exceed 25% of pairings at each domicile. #shutthefrontdoor! #saywhaaat?! #whosesideareyouonanyway?! (#dontworrycuzitsoffthetable!)

The Negotiating Committee knows there are many strong feelings about increasing the duty day and this was a very difficult position for your committee to even consider. Rest assured that we would have never gone there unless we were confident the overall package would have strongly benefited from this move and we could address the implications of a longer day.

We can’t disclose exact numbers but here are some facts to consider. According to survey results, some Flight Attendants might be willing to fly an extended duty day under very specific circumstances if there were guarantees that the pairings would be extremely productive. However, the vast majority of Flight Attendants are adamantly opposed to a longer duty day under any circumstances. At the same time, all Flight Attendants are interested in the efficiencies guaranteed by rigs. This move was a calculated effort to achieve all objectives as much as possible.

Of course management was interested in the longer duty day and asked for some time to do analysis through the pairing optimizer. We agreed.

Initially, management reportedly ran the analysis without their or our proposed rigs and with no 25% cap on pairings over 10 ½ duty hours. Unsurprisingly, management said the results were inconclusive and unhelpful in figuring out the effect of any of the rigs or duty days. We spent the entire session waiting for additional results. It was a creeping delay that tied us to our caucus room. Two hours dragged into four then into six then overnight…….it turned into another one of management’s “productivity sits.” (Note to Negotiating Committee: don’t forget to submit for stranded pay!)

We did have discussions with management’s team regarding rigs and it quickly became apparent that management was entertaining below industry-standard rigs. Duty and trip rigs in the industry are based on hourly pay (“block hours”), except for Southwest Airlines’ TFP rigs. We proposed rigs based on TFP, but management refused to consider our intended application which recognized that there is an average of 1.13 TFP in every block hour.

In order to make a fair conversion to a TFP environment, a conversion factor (1.13) must be applied. In our caucus-room discussions, management refused to convert the hourly rate to TFP for the trip and duty rigs. This resulted in below standard rigs. We went through many examples and in the end, management’s team said they understood; however, they were firm in their position—even though their application resulted in a 13% reduction in the rig compared to industry standard.

Our frustration mounted over the week and it became obvious that management would only consider mediocre rigs and was looking for more than 25% of pairings to contain duty days in excess of 10 ½ hours. This was a deal that we did not want to pursue.

Therefore, we have taken the duty day in excess of 10 ½ hours off the table and gone back to book on that provision. Know that management is adamantly opposed to any type of duty or trip rig on a 10 ½ hour duty day restriction; however, your committee is still actively looking into solutions to reduce long sit time, inefficient pairings and long layovers with no pay.

As we mentioned in the last update, for those of you interested in ratcheting up the heat, contact your LEC president regarding volunteer opportunities.

Council 30 ANC: Melanie Buker – melanie.buker@gmail.com

Council 19 SEA: Laura Masserant – lmasserant@yahoo.com

Council 39 PDX: Cathy Gwynn – catgwynn@comcast.net

Council 18 LAX/SAN: Sandra Morrow – sleemorrow@verizon.net

We have our sixth mediation session in Seattle, WA, December 10^th -12^th.

In solidarity,

Your AFA Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

negotiations@alaskamec.org

https://www.facebook.com/alaskaairlines.negotiations

http://www.youtube.com/user/AFAALANegotiations

“Five Bases, One Voice”

alaskamec.org

Dear Flight Attendants,

Your Negotiating Committee heads to San Diego this coming week for our fifth mediation session. Bargaining will take place November 12th-14th under the direction of Victoria Gray with the National Mediation Board (NMB).

Each of you is aware that we are down to the core issues in negotiations: economics. If we do not reach an agreement with management on a new deal in this next session, it will be time to turn up the heat. If we want improvements, we must step up to the plate.

Have you been outspoken in your demands for pay and benefits? Then now is the time to focus on our future and pull together and demonstrate to management that we can be a powerful force and fight together to secure our future. Contact your local executive council (LEC) officers and add yourself to a list of volunteers to help organize activities and participate in upcoming events.

Council 30 ANC: http://alaskamec.org/council-30-officers/

Council 19 SEA: http://alaskamec.org/council-19-sea-officers/

Council 39 PDX: http://alaskamec.org/pdx/officers/

Council 18 LAX/SAN: http://alaskamec.org/council-18-lax-officers/

In a recent interview, Brad recognized Alaska’s “best quarter ever” and the contribution of all the employees in achieving that result. Well, we see our Company’s positive financial trend and we want our “best contract ever.” In the interview, he also acknowledged the uncertainties and challenges that our Company faces—especially from Delta! That is exactly why management needs to come to the table with the intention of putting serious money into our contract and making us feel valued as employees.

Labor relations strife as a result of Flight Attendant contract negotiations is not what the Company needs right now. A new contract that makes Flight Attendants feel valued for their contribution is what is needed. Then we can all move forward and do what we do best: continue to work hard together to solidify Alaska’s position as the most respected and successful airline in the industry. Alaska Airlines Flight Attendants are proud to have helped build that reputation. If management can agree to an appropriately rewarding contract, we look forward to participating in our collective bright future!

In solidarity,

Your AFA Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

negotiations@alaskamec.org

https://www.facebook.com/alaskaairlines.negotiations

http://www.youtube.com/user/AFAALANegotiations

“Five Bases, One Voice”

Dear Flight Attendants,

Your AFA Negotiating Committee just wrapped up our fourth mediation session October 29-30, 2013. This session was held at the National Mediation Board (NMB) in Washington, DC, and overseen by federal mediator Victoria Gray. We were again joined by transportation economist Dan Akins as our financial advisor. Although we did not reach a tentative agreement (TA) on any sections this session and there is some distance between our positions, we believe there is a willingness on both sides to get a deal in the near future.

On Monday we were joined at the table by Alaska Air Group (AAG) Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Brandon Pedersen. He came to answer any questions we had about Alaska’s stock buy-back program and the recent decision to pay a dividend on AAG stock (NYSE: ALK). AFA believes that if senior management and the AAG Board of Directors are willing to direct significant funds back to the shareholders, our leaders should also be willing to reward their Flight Attendants in kind. Following the discussion with Brandon, management passed us a comprehensive proposal at the end of the day which made some movement toward our position.

We spent Tuesday morning in further evaluation of management’s proposal and in formulating our response. Pat Sims, senior mediator with the NMB, dropped by mid-day to talk about our negotiations and she stayed through the remainder of the day. After we returned from lunch we smelled a weird electrical smell and further investigation revealed smoke coming from the ceiling!

Luckily, our caucus room was filled with first responders and we successfully evacuated in under 90 seconds! (Okay, maybe we’re dramatizing the event ever so slightly.) Seriously, though, we did have to move to a different part of the building after it was discovered that the air conditioning motor had seized up and was smoking. That evening after all the excitement had passed we gave management a comprehensive response to their proposal.

As a consequence of the electrical issue, on Wednesday we were required to relocate to the Hamilton Hotel just down the street from the NMB. AFA Director of Collective Bargaining Clare Burt joined us for the bulk of the day. Mediator Gray met separately with both sides and there was some consultation about how to move the discussion forward. We had a small group discussion with Mediator Gray and the principle members of management’s team which seemed to put the talks back on track. We will continue that dialogue on a conference call early next week and expect to resume mediation in San Diego, CA, November 12-14, 2013.

In the meantime, we appreciate your supportive messages and the faith you show in your representatives at the table. It is a difficult job we are undertaking to better the situation for all of us. Please stay strong, stay informed and together we will prevail!

In solidarity,

Your AFA Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

negotiations@alaskamec.org

https://www.facebook.com/alaskaairlines.negotiations

http://www.youtube.com/user/AFAALANegotiations

“Five Bases, One Voice”