AFA Alaska + Hawaiian

Representing the Flight Attendants of Alaska + Hawaiian

Click here to report an issue to AFA
Menu
  • Local Councils
    • Anchorage (Council 30)
      • Officers
      • Committees
    • Honolulu (Council 43)
      • Officers
      • Committees
    • Los Angeles (Council 18 pmAS)
      • Officers
      • Committees
      • Los Angeles/Seattle (Council 47 pmHA)
        • Officers
      • Portland (Council 39)
        • Officers
        • Committees
      • San Diego (Council 15)
        • Officers
        • Committees
        • Seattle (Council 19 pmAS)
          • Officers
          • Committees
        • San Francisco (Council 35)
          • Officers
          • Committees

        • More About Local Councils >>
        Close
      • Master Executive Council
        • Officers
        • Close
      • Committees
          • Air Safety, Health, & Security (ASHSC)
            • Air Quality
          • Benefits
          • Communications
          • Employee Assistance Program & Professional Standards
          • Government Affairs
          • Grievance
          • Hotel
          • Human Rights & Equity
          • Inflight Service
          • Inflight Training
          • Membership
          • Membership Engagement
          • Reserve
          • Retirement
          • Scheduling
            • Pairing Construction
            • Preferential Bidding System (PBS)
          • Uniform

        • More About Committees >>
        Close
      • Contract
          • Contract Home
            • 2025 Alaska Contract
            • 2025 Hawaiian Contract Extension
            • Ask Contract Questions
          • Contract Resources
          • Alaska Contract Negotiations (2022-2025)
        • Close
      • Resources
          • What To Do If You Encounter Contaminated Cabin Air
          • Issues & Campaigns
          • Newsroom
            • AFA News Now
          • Event Calendar
          • Membership Services
          • New Members
          • About
          • Links
          Close
        • Merger
          • Joint Negotiating Committee
          • Close
        • Contact Us
        You are here: Home / Latest News

        October 7, 2013 17:00

        Dear Flight Attendants,

         

         

        The 3rd Annual Flight Attendant Drug and Alcohol Program (FADAP) Conference was held last week at the Maritime Institute Conference Center in Linthicum Heights, MD. From the FADAP homepage: “FADAP is a substance-abuse prevention program, created and promoted for and by the flight attendant profession and funded by the FAA.” The conference was well-attended by AFA at Alaska Airlines, including several members of the Master Executive Council (MEC), the Employee Assistance Program (EAP), Wings of Sobriety facilitators and Flight Attendant Recovery Peers. We are also very proud that Vice President of Inflight Services Andy Schneider and Rick Archuleta from Human Resources were there representing Alaska Airlines management.

         

        As Flight Attendants well know, our profession is strictly regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) in terms of drug and alcohol use. What you may not know is that the DOT does not automatically require a Flight Attendant’s certification to be pulled and her or his employment terminated based upon failure of a single alcohol or drug test. The “zero tolerance” policy is a Company policy.

         

        AFA at Alaska supports “zero tolerance” but with options for continued employment. AFA is not advocating for compromising our safety—quite the contrary! We do, however, recognize chemical dependency is a complex medical condition that has serious implications for those affected—including peers, family and friends. Due to the safety-sensitive nature of our work, it is in the best interest of our entire profession that we optimize opportunities to identify chemical abuse and intervene as early as possible. AFA strongly believes that with management’s support, a robust “return to cabin” program for Flight Attendants based on rigorously structured treatment and monitored recovery is an effective means to this end.

         

        AFA is hopeful that management seems willing to review the current policy not just for Flight Attendants but for all employees. We sincerely thank Andy and Rick for their support at the conference and for their work as the “advance team” in regards to this effort!

         

         

        In solidarity,

         

         

        Your MEC – Jeffrey Peterson, Terry Taylor, Yvette Gesch, Melanie Buker, Laura Masserant, Cathy Gwynn and Sandra Morrow

         

        “Five Bases, One Voice”

        alaskamec.org

         

        Resources:

         

        Flight Attendant Drug and Alcohol Program (FADAP): http://www.fadap.org/

         

        Filed Under: Latest News

        October 4, 2013 18:47

        Your LEC Officers are thrilled with the overwhelming show of solidarity by the outpouring of advanced t-shirt requests from our strong and very united membership.  Go AFA!

        With this awareness comes the realization that our original plan to set aside t-shirts for those ordering in advance, is not possible.  Therefore all t-shirts will be handed out on a first come, first served basis prior to the meeting.  We will do our best to provide you with a fit as close to your size as possible.

        Although we are not anticipating it, if we run out of shirts entirely, we’d like you to come prepared with a shirt in the same color scheme (royal/cobalt blue).  We’d also like to request that AFA sits together in a sea of AFA blue.

        Your AFA officers will be in the lobby of the Grand Californian at 1 PM!

        We apologize for not being able to respond to each email we received.

        Thank you all for you commitment and dedication to our over 3000 member strong Union at Alaska.

        We look forward to seeing you on the 9th

        In solidarity,

        Sandra, Kelly, Kelese and David

        Filed Under: Council 15 SAN, Council 18 LAX (pmAS) Tagged With: 2013, LAX, meeting, October, SAN

        October 4, 2013 10:02

        Dear Flight Attendants,

         

         

        There has been an incredible amount of chatter about Section 14 Vacations and changes to the annual 480 TFP minimum. As a result, your Negotiating Committee feels compelled to address the chatter. Under an agreement we had with management – through the mediator – detailed information like this was not supposed to be communicated until we had a full tentative agreement (TA). At that point you would have been able to consider all provisions, including improved pay, etc., together in one package. Unfortunately, details were spelled out in the latest edition of management’s Grab & Go that left many of you wondering…”What the heck is this?!”

         

        Since then, we have informed management and the mediator that AFA will no longer abide by the “communication blackout.” This cannot be a one-sided effort and it seems to us that after every session, this policy has caused big issues for us. So, NO MORE!

         

        OK, on to explaining Vacation Section Changes:

         

        There were several changes to the S14 Vacations. Please read through the entire communication as the new system is fairly complicated. Why is it so complex? Management is on a serious mission to reduce benefits to those who do not work “sufficiently” in their eyes to earn those benefits. The Negotiating Committee, in turn, had to protect the accruals of those who were not able to earn the benefit due to a leave of absence or other situation beyond their control. Thus the intricate provisions that had to be created.

         

        While we are not in complete agreement with management’s philosophy because of the impact to our group’s scheduling flexibility, we did walk a little way down that road in an effort to beef up the economic package. The economics, of course, continue to be a work in progress. In the end, YOU will decide if the entire TA package is sufficient for ratification.

         

        Now, we will to take this opportunity to share with you the tentatively agreed graduated accruals and seven (7) days of Longevity Paid Time Off (PTO) concept:

         

         

        BASE VACATION ACCRUALS (no change except addition of longevity PTO):

        Years of service Days of Vacation
        < 1 year 1.167 days per month employed
        1 – 4 14 days
        5 – 9 21 days
        10 – 17 28 days
        18 – 24 35 days
        (new) 25+ years with 960 Worked TFP, excluding vacation and sick leave. 35 days plus additional 7 days Longevity PTO

         

        Important Concepts to Understand:

         

        Worked TFP = ALL credited TFP (including premiums, training, etc.), but excluding Sick Leave and Vacation.

         

        Twelve (12) Month Look-Back = The last twelve (12) bid months of full paid activity. Any bid month in which a Flight Attendant coordinates sick leave with short/long term disability or worker’s compensation pay will not count toward the 480 TFP (or 240 TFP) threshold calculation. A full twelve (12) month look back will extend into additional months until twelve (12) full months are included in the determination of the threshold. That is, any bid month in which a Flight Attendant is an a leave of absence (LOA) and is coordinating sick leave will be skipped for the purposes of the 480 TFP. This way, FAs are not penalized for months in which they are on a medical or on the job injury (OJI) leave and coordinating with sick leave.

         

        1.333 TFP Daily Credit on LOAs Not Using Sick Leave = FAs will receive an unpaid credit of 1.333 TFP for each day on which they are on an unpaid personal, military, extended, medical, maternity, FMLA, worker’s compensation or parental leaves of absence or on a furlough (including voluntary furlough) when they are not coordinating w/ sick leave. This credit will count towards the “480.” (This is the same application in the current contract for unpaid LOAs.)

         

        Vacation Accrual Reduction 1/12 for Full Unpaid Bid Month: A Flight Attendant who does not have Worked TFP, vacation pay, or sick leave during a bid month will have her/his vacation entitlement reduced by 1/12. (Same application as today.)

         

        Annual Worked TFP Impact:

        Graduated Accrual for Worked TFP
        0 – 239 TFP No accrual/no pay of vacation days for subsequent year.
        240 – 479 TFP Accrue half of the vacation days above and vacation days are unpaid.
        480+ TFP Full accrual and pay for vacation days.

         

         

        New Provision for those with 960+ TFP and at least 25 years seniority:

         

        Longevity PTO: In addition to vacation accruals a Flight Attendant employed twenty five (25) years or longer who at her/his option has greater than or equal to 960 Worked TFP will qualify for an additional seven (7) days of longevity PTO. Although similar, PTO is not to be confused with vacation time. PTO is personal time off rewarded for productivity and working high time. 960 TFP equates to (not including vacation or sick leave credit) an average of 79.5 TFP monthly in addition to the six (6) TFP annual credit for recurrent training. Other required training TFP credit such as Flight Path or computer based training would apply to the formula.

         

        Vacation and Longevity PTO shall be paid at four (4) TFP per day. The Longevity PTO will be bid with your vacation and awarded as split six (6). The maximum number of vacation/PTO periods in any month is increased from three (3) to four (4). Flight Attendants may continue to request early vacation/Longevity PTO pay.

         

        Some Flight Attendants have asked why the vacation credit was not increased above four (4) TFP per day. This is particularly true in light of the Reserve guarantee based on five (5) TFP per day. (“Why should I get paid less on my vacation than a Reserve?”)

         

        Here’s a little background. Our vacations are bid based on a full week (or seven days). True, one can split vacation blocks to less than seven days in “Vacation Open Time” but that is after the fact. Looking at vacation on the basis of a full week, a Flight Attendant is credited 28 TFP for seven days of vacation. In contrast, the Reserve guarantee based on a five day work week (due to 48/7 contractual legalities) is 25 TFP.

         

        We also looked at other carriers and 4 TFP per day vacation credit (or 3.54 block-hours per day when comparing to all other carriers except Southwest) is a very competitive benefit. That is, 4 TFP per day is right there with the highest credit in the industry. The fact is our vacation accruals are also very competitive. Taking all this information under consideration, the Negotiating Committee made the determination to focus more of our bargaining in other areas related to compensation such as rigs, pay rates, 401(k) match, holidays, and other premiums.

         

        Your Negotiating Committee spent countless hours reviewing, discussing and enhancing the provisions of Section 14. In summary, we were successful in negotiating:

        • A longevity PTO provision of seven (7) days, and
        • A full twelve (12) bid month look-back for the purpose of calculating the 240/480 Worked TFP thresholds so those on LOAs and coordinating sick leave are not “dinged” for doing so.

        Some have asked the Negotiating Committee to “reopen” negotiations related to changes in the 480 TFP threshold (i.e. “Hard time” vs “soft time”). This is not likely to happen because the related sections have been TA’d. We can understand the confusion because several provisions have been changed after being TA’d so far. The difference is that the parties mutually agreed to reopen the TA’d sections.

        Considering that making changes to minimum flying benefits was one of management’s primary objectives in these negotiations, we do not believe management will be inclined to do so this time. Your Negotiating Committee has done our best to minimize changes to the 480 TFP minimum. Just know that after months of negotiations and heavy consideration, we only agreed to the changes with the expectation that management “make up for it” in the compensation package. Consequently, Flight Attendants will need to consider the changes in Section 14 Vacations in the context of the entire TA once presented.

        Thank you for your continued support! It really makes all the difference knowing that you are behind us at the table!

         

         

        In solidarity,

         

         

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

        “Five Bases, One Voice”

        negotiations@alaskamec.org

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        October 3, 2013 17:37

        Dear Flight Attendants,

         

        It has come to our attention that Alaska Airlines Vice President of Inflight Services Andy Schneider and other members of management have been calling some Flight Attendants who have emailed regarding AFA contract negotiations. You cannot be retaliated against for putting forth your opinion and the calls to date have not implied that.

         

        First of all please know that if you feel uncomfortable discussing negotiations, you have the absolute right to refuse to discuss that subject—even if you are speaking directly with Andy.

        Secondly, if you do choose to discuss negotiations feel free to pass along that you expect management to do the right thing on the overall compensation and benefits package. You can tell them that your Negotiating Committee speaks for you. Do not engage in any conversation in which you are asked (and please do not volunteer!) to rank different contract provisions, e.g. “Which are more important? $X in compensation or rigs?” etc.

         

        If management engages you in conversation via phone or email regarding specific negotiations objectives, it is imperative that you email negotiations@alaskamec.org with the details so that AFA can investigate.

         

        Thanks for your support of the Negotiating Committee. Together we will fight for the contract we all deserve. If you have not already contacted management via email, we suggest that you add a disclaimer stating that you do not want feedback.

         

        Remember: in all discussions with management, maintain a respectful tone and “My Negotiating Committee speaks for me!”

         

        In solidarity,

         

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

         

        “Five Bases, One Voice”

        negotiations@alaskamec.org

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        October 2, 2013 11:38

        SAVE THE DATE:

        The San Diego base meeting is set for November 5th.
        Time and location to be announced (TBA*).

        This will be your chance to engage with your LEC officers, ask questions, and get answers.

        *More info as soon as location is finalized.

        Filed Under: Council 15 SAN

        October 2, 2013 11:33

        Let’s make our voice heard this Wednesday at the company meeting!

        Join in and show our SOLIDARITY at the Company Fall Meeting October 9th. Your LEC will be be there in AFA Blue at Grand California Disneyland. The meeting is from 2:30pm-4pm with a following reception until 6pm (free parking).

        RSVP for the meeting and reception through the First Class email from Andy & Co.

        Contact Kelly Johnson, Kelese Stallings, or David Lehman to get a blue AFA t-shirt. Send an email to laxvice@aol.com with your name and shirt size (the t-shirts are pre-shrunk and true to size), and she will get a shirt to you on the day of the event.

        short term loans bad credit no guarantor

        You only get a T-shirt if you show up.

        Five Bases, One VOICE!

        Filed Under: Council 15 SAN, Council 18 LAX (pmAS), Latest News Tagged With: LAX, meeting, SAN, T-Shirts

        September 27, 2013 12:39

        Dear Seattle Flight Attendants,

        I want to reach out to you and encourage you to attend the company fall meeting October 8, 2013. Your LEC Officers will be outside the hangar handing out blue AFA t-shirts and AFA pins. If you would like to get a new AFA t-shirt simply send an email with your shirt size (the t-shirts are pre-shrunk and true to size) and mail code to Laura Masserant and I will get a shirt to you before the event.

        This is a perfect opportunity to show management that we are a strong, united group and that we are serious about obtaining a solid contract with industry leading wages and work rules.

        The negotiation committee heads back to Washington DC the last week of October and we need to send a strong message to management that says, “My Negotiation Committee Speaks for Me!”

        In solidarity,

        Laura Masserant

        LEC President, Seattle

        Council 19

        AFA-CWA

        Filed Under: Council 19 SEA (pmAS)

        September 26, 2013 16:58

        Dear Flight Attendants,

         

        AFA has recently received a variety of questions and concerns with respect to Section 8.I in Hours of Service of our Collective Bargaining Agreement, or what’s commonly referred to as the “Night Rule.” It states the following:

         

        “If a Flight Attendant is on duty at 4 AM (except for an APSB who has not had a flying assignment prior to the APSB assignment during the same duty period), s/he will not be required to remain on duty beyond 8:30 AM. The Company many build single-duty period sequences with one (1) return to domicile outside these parameters, but the Flight Attendant will not be scheduled for additional flying after the return to domicile.”

        This language is important because it ensures that if you are on duty at 4AM (except when on a single duty period turn, i.e. SEA-ANC-SEA) you cannot be scheduled to remain on duty beyond 8:30AM. The language was incorporated into the contract in 2006 and was designed to address concerns with additional scheduled flying following an all-nighter.

        With the changeover from the former AOS pairing optimizer to the current Jeppesen pairing optimizer we started seeing pairings that have an additional leg following all-nighter flying. This was as early as July 2013. AOS was programmed to prohibit any additional flying if on duty at 4am. Jeppesen operates using a different algorithm that more closely mirrors the contractual language. Consequently, the Jeppesen solutions will contain sequences with a leg added to flying following an all-nighter. The only caveat is that these pairings must release prior to 8:30 AM as measured from the timezone of the initial departure station in that duty period. (More on that shortly.)

        Example: Seattle pairing #9695 from the August 2013 bid packet departs on day two from OGG at 10:15 PM Hawaii Standard Time (HST), lands in PDX at 6:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) the following day and then departs to SFO and releases at 9:35 AM PDT. Days 1-3 of this 4-day pairing are illustrated below.

        Day 1

        867 SEA 18:20 OGG 21:15

        Day 2/3

        822 OGG 22:15 PDX 06:22

        244 PDX 07:35 SFO 09:20

        The reason this pairing is legal under the Night Rule is that the 8:30 AM release restriction is based on the time zone in which the duty period starts (i.e. the initial departure station time) and not local time. The release time is 9:35 AM PDT which is actually 6:35 AM HST (as Hawaii does not observe DST) and is therefore legal because release is before 8:30 AM HST.

        AFA is very much aware that the language is silent in regards to the time zone. Management asserted that they should not “lose” one or more hours of scheduling availability simply because a Flight Attendant is advancing through time zones by flying east. After extensive research into the bargaining history from that period we were able to confirm that it was not the intent of either party to apply additional “artificial” restrictions on the Night Rule due to changing time zones.

        Otherwise if the parties agreed that the Night Rule was based on local time, the opposite argument could be made. That is, management would gain one or more hours of scheduling availability if a Flight Attendant was flying west and obviously AFA is not going to agree to that interpretation. The reality is that the ability to create these types of pairings while complying with the Night Rule was not anticipated by either party in the mid-2000s.

        There are a variety of factors that have changed since those negotiations which have made it easier for the pairing optimizer to build this type of pairing:

        • Shorter block times, which allow for new combinations of segments to be legally scheduled within the 10 ½ hour duty day;

        • A dramatic increase in Hawaii flying; and

        • An expanded route structure with more flying across the system.

        When AFA first became aware that the new pairing optimizer was creating these types of pairings, a meeting was held between representatives from Alaska Airlines Scheduling & Planning and AFA. At that meeting AFA expressed concern that although the pairings were technically legal, additional scheduled flying following all-nighters was too hard on the crews working them.

        Management informed us of their intent to continue building these types of pairings. However, management did offer to voluntarily place some additional restrictions into the pairing optimizer:

        • No additional flying would be scheduled following an all-nighter on the last day of a sequence (so that a Flight Attendant would not be released to drive home at domicile after additional night flying); and

        • If an additional leg were to be scheduled following an all-nighter, the ground time would not exceed eighty nine (89) minutes.

        AFA continues to be concerned about the health and safety of the Flight Attendants working these trips due to fatigue. Despite the voluntary restrictions being in place for over a month now, it is clear they are not helping. The example pairing above is often hit with long ground times and block delays due to air traffic control (ATC) delays into SFO.

        We need assistance from Flight Attendants who are flying these trips or who have flown all-nighters in the past to send us feedback detailing the impacts to crews who are forced to fly under these conditions. The AFA Alaska Safety, Health and Security Committee (SHSC) is helping our effort by providing information regarding the overall impact of fatigue and the interruption of the circadian rhythm. However, having first-hand accounts from Flight Attendants will have the greatest impact in convincing management to change these pairings.

        Please send your comments to MEC Grievance Chair Jennifer Wise MacColl at jenwmac@comcast.net.

        In solidarity,

        Your MEC – Jeffrey Peterson, Terry Taylor, Yvette Gesch, Melanie Buker, Laura Masserant, Cathy Gwynn and Sandra Morrow; and MEC Grievance Chair Jennifer Wise MacColl

        “Five Bases, One Voice”

        alaskamec.org

        Filed Under: Latest News

        September 26, 2013 09:04

        Friend us on Facebook!

        LAX Council 18’s Facebook page is up and running. All things AFA will be available at https://www.facebook.com/afalax18.

        All you have to do is sign in and send a friend request to ‘AFA LAX Council 18’.

        If you’re new to Facebook and want to start an account follow the steps below.

        1. Go to www.facebook.com

        2. enter name and email

        3. select gender and DOB

        4. click on ‘Signup’ button

        5. confirm your email 

        6.   click on verification link

        7. now you can access FB and find friends.

        8. Add AFA LAX Council to your list of friends.

         

        Facebook not for you? The same information is available here at www.alaskamec.org

        Filed Under: Council 15 SAN, Council 18 LAX (pmAS)

        September 25, 2013 18:43

        [Note: Please read this communication in its entirety. It is lengthy, but the detail is necessary to fully explain the changes. –NC]

         

        Dear Flight Attendants,

         

        There are still rumors and misinformation surrounding the tentative agreement (TA) specific to Junior Assignments. It has been a while since we explained the proposed changes to JA and your Negotiating Committee will take this opportunity to review the process, the provisions and the enhancements to our current system compared to the TA.

         

        What is JA?: Junior Available occurs when a Flight Attendant is required to work on an unscheduled day(s) [i.e., a day off] or when Crew Scheduling assigns additional flying after a completed sequence.

         

        What is a Reassignment?: Reassignment is any assignment changes or additions occurring on days you are already scheduled to fly, although may carry into days you were scheduled to be off.

         

        Chart outlining the current JA system vs. the TA’d version

         

         

        JA premium

        Can FA trade JA assignment?

        Premium follow trade?

        If FA JA’d out or order?

        FA not JA’d?

        Premium OT to avoid JA

        TODAY

        1.5x pay

        Not really*

        N/A

        1.5x

        N/A

        N/A

        TA

        2.5x pay

        Yes

        Yes

        3.0x

        2.5x

        1.5x min

         

        *Under the current contract, a JA trip may be posted for trade only once and you must contact Crew Scheduling to work out the trade. What that effectively means is that nobody trades a JA trip and in fact it is so inaccessible that very few Flight Attendants realize this provision even exists per 9.G of the Contract. The TA provides for unlimited trading of the pairing without restrictions.

         

        Current Process TODAY:

         

        Company decides in order to cover the operation they need to utilize Junior Available provisions of Section 9. Crew Scheduling (CSKD) utilizes the monthly seniority list starting with most junior qualified, available Flight Attendant in the domicile from which the sequence departs who is completely legal for the flight(s) or sequence to be assigned. CSKD will start at the bottom of the list and work up: 1) by calling the FA at the primary contact number on file with CSKD if s/he is not already on duty, or 2) if s/he is on duty, by flagging the FA to be contacted in flight via ACARS in and/or a supervisor upon arrival.

         

        Due to improvements to technology (e.g. caller ID), only about 1 out of 200 Flight Attendants on the average answer their phone—usually by mistake.

         

        Except for a very few, in reality Flight Attendants who are already on duty are the ones who are JA’d today – because it’s a game of “tag, you’re it.” True, there might be a delay in notification because CSKD has to go through the charade of calling those at home but they still get you nonetheless. If you are tagged for JA today, it is because CSKD has already attempted to call everybody junior to you who is legal for the assignment(s). Remember that legalities disqualify many FAs and you also cannot be JA’d if you trade away a trip off your original line on that day. (This loophole legally allows many junior Flight Attendants to become ineligible for JA with just a few clever manipulations of their schedules.)

         

        A Flight Attendant cannot be contacted for JA duty more than twenty-four (24) hours before the needed scheduled sequence or reserve duty period. Flight Attendants who are JA’d are offered 1.5 times the appropriate trip rate or a day off at straight pay of her/his choice equal in number to those assigned by the JA assignment.

         

        New TA’d Section 9 Junior Available procedure:

         

        Company decides in order to cover the operation they need to utilize Junior Available provisions of Section 9. Prior to attempting to JA any Flight Attendant, CSKD can post the trips in OT with a minimum 1.5x premium to encourage someone to pick it up. The premium can be increased to 2.0x or even 2.5x and once the premium goes on the trip, it cannot be removed unless assigned to a Reserve or there is a cancellation. Crew Schedulers do not want to JA Flight Attendants and Premium OT is actually a cheaper option for the Company even at 2.0x pay because we raised the JA premium to 2.5x pay.

         

        Crew Scheduling utilizes the monthly seniority list starting with the most junior available Flight Attendant on duty anytime the day prior—essentially the same list utilized today. For the purposes of this provision, duty is defined with specific reference to inbound working crews and any Flight Attendant on a layover or at check-in—basically anytime you are accruing time away from base (TAFB).

         

        The new provision eliminates the step of calling Flight Attendants at home who do not answer their phones. This “trade-off” results in hugely increased premiums at a significant financial penalty to the Company!

         

        Remember – the Company today has the ability to JA working Flight Attendants concurrently with making the calls to Flight Attendants at home. It really just depends on whether ‘your number is up’ on the seniority list of those legal for the assignment(s).

         

        If a Flight Attendant is JA’d the Flight Attendant will receive a premium of 2.5 times the applicable trip rate for all flying.

         

        Under the TA there is no option to elect days off when receiving a JA assignment. Why did we change this? The thought process behind this new JA provision is to minimize the number of Flight Attendants affected by JA. When a Flight Attendant chooses a day off in lieu of compensation it affects Reserve coverage on subsequent days which often causes additional JA assignments or reassignments due to operational needs. The goal is to cover the operation and get flying back to normal with the least amount of impact to the group.

         

        If a Flight Attendant receives a Junior Assignment, Crew Scheduling is required to notify the FA if they will fall below the minimum of 12 days off in a bid month or if there is a 48/7 violation and the Flight Attendant may decline the Junior Assignment if either situation applies.

         

        Flight Attendants will have the ability to trade Junior Assignments and the premium of 2.5 times the applicable rate will follow the sequence. A Flight Attendant may be contacted for JA duty while on a sequence no earlier than the preceding calendar day before the needed, scheduled sequence or reserve duty period.

         

        The preservation of seniority is critical! We eliminated the loophole that allowed junior Flight Attendants to gain “super seniority” and avoid JA by trading away trips from their original line. Some FAs would swap trips with each other and become “untouchable” for JA for an entire month. This is course would push the JA list even higher in seniority. Well, no longer!

         

        The new process, protections and provisions allow for both the Flight Attendants and the Company to manage and audit the Junior Available assignments. Transparency is integral to this provision. Consequently, management will provide a list of those JA’d so the assignments can be fact-checked.

         

        With such a high premium attached to JA assignments the Negotiating Committee is extremely confident that the Company will first attempt to utilize Reserves, make reassignment adjustments to those already flying (when applicable—this very rarely happens) and offer Premium Open Time (minimum 1.5 times the applicable trip rate) prior to JA’ing.

         

        As a last and final resort to cover the operation the Company will utilize the provisions of Section 9, while also protecting seniority, minimum days off and contractual rest provisions.

         

        Your Negotiating Committee spent countless hours reviewing, discussing and enhancing the provisions of Section 9. We were successful in negotiating a seniority-based system of assignment, protections, waivers and compensation. We are optimistic that once we present a contract to the membership for ratification, Flight Attendants will read over Section 9 Junior Available Rules and understand the complete depth of all changes and improvements.

         

         

        In solidarity,

         

         

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

         

        “Five Bases, One Voice”

        negotiations@alaskamec.org

        [Post script from MEC President Jeffrey Peterson: Many of you have written directly to me over the last month or so asking for clarification to this section. I have been able to respond to many but I apologize that I have definitely fallen way behind on writing back to some of you individually. If you haven’t heard back from me on this issue I hope this communication will go a long ways towards answering your questions and/or addressing your concerns. The other members of the Negotiating Committee have kindly offered to assist in answering negotiations-related questions in a more timely manner. You can email negotiations@alaskamec.org and your message will be sent to all members of the AFA Alaska Negotiating Committee. -jtp]

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        • « Previous Page
        • 1
        • …
        • 231
        • 232
        • 233
        • 234
        • 235
        • …
        • 247
        • Next Page »

        Need Help?

        Have an issue or concern to report to AFA?  Click here to access the AFA Alaska online support center.

        Latest News

        • AFA News in Review – June 5, 2026
        • Joint Contract Negotiations Session 15 – June 2026
        • Local Committee Interviews – July 2026
        • Celebrating LGBTQ Pride Month
        • Council 39 May 2026 Update
        • AFA News in Review – May 29, 2026
        • Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026
        • Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026
        • Struggling With A Coworker? Consider AFA Professional Standards.
        • Crew Meal Survey Closing Soon

        Joint Contract Negotiations Session 15 – June 2026

        June 5, 2026

        The JNC has been actively negotiating key sections of the contract, focusing on vacation, sick leave, and temporary duty assignments. A tentative agreement was reached on Section 37 (Temporary Duty Assignments), ensuring financial protections and fair treatment for Flight Attendants during temporary assignments. These ongoing discussions demonstrate a commitment to integrating the best benefits from both Alaska and Hawaiian CBAs for all members.

        Celebrating LGBTQ Pride Month

        June 1, 2026

        Every June, we come together to honor LGBTQ Pride Month in the United States—a time to celebrate the remarkable resilience, diversity, and achievements of the LGBTQ community. Pride Month began as a tribute to the Stonewall Uprising in Manhattan in 1969, a pivotal moment that ignited the modern LGBTQ rights movement. The inaugural Pride March, […]

        Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026

        May 29, 2026

        On Wednesday, May 20, our Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) representatives met virtually to discuss ongoing safety concerns, operational challenges, policy updates, and workplace improvements impacting Flight Attendants across the operation. Representing you at the meeting were Deb Wallstrom (ANC), David Lake (SEA), Kalin Lackey (PDX), Bradley Young (SFO), Bryce Sarmiento (LAX pmAS), […]

        Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026

        May 29, 2026

        This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants On Tuesday, May 26, our pre-merger Alaska AFA Scheduling Committee Chairpersons and Representatives met virtually to discuss their ongoing work to represent our Flight Attendants and push for improvements in our workplace. Representing you at the meeting were Rebekah Olds (ANC), Rita Tillou (SEA), Melodie Anderes (PDX), […]

        Struggling With A Coworker? Consider AFA Professional Standards.

        May 27, 2026

        We all know flying can be demanding—long days, irregular hours, and fatigue are part of the job. It’s natural for tensions to rise. Before you head to management or vent on social media, consider Professional Standards. In this video, Ava McWilliams-Ellington, pre-merger Alaska LAX EAP/Professional Standards Committee Chairperson, shares how Professional Standards provides a confidential, […]

        Recent Posts

        • AFA News in Review – June 5, 2026
        • Joint Contract Negotiations Session 15 – June 2026
        • Local Committee Interviews – July 2026
        • Celebrating LGBTQ Pride Month
        • Council 39 May 2026 Update
        • AFA News in Review – May 29, 2026
        • Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026
        • Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026
        • Struggling With A Coworker? Consider AFA Professional Standards.
        • Crew Meal Survey Closing Soon
        • AFA News in Review – May 22, 2026
        • When the Unexpected Happens in the Skies: How the Critical Incident Response Program (CIRP) Supports You
        • Council 43 (HNL) LEC Officer Election Results
        • Council 39 (PDX) LEC Officer Election Results
        • Hotel Committee Meeting Recap – May 2026

        Local Councils

        • Anchorage
        • Honolulu
        • Los Angeles (pre-merger Alaska)
        • Los Angeles/Seattle (pre-merger Hawaiian)
        • Portland
        • San Diego
        • San Francisco
        • Seattle (pre-merger Alaska)

        Master Executive Council

        • MEC

        Contract

        • Contract Home

        Committees

        • Air Safety, Health, & Security
        • Benefits
        • Communications
        • EAP/Professional Standards
        • Government Affairs
        • Grievance
        • Hotel
        • Human Rights
        • Inflight Service
        • Membership Engagement
        • Reserve
        • Retirement
        • Scheduling
        • Uniform

        News By Month

        News By Category

        AFA News Now Air Quality Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) AS/HA Merger AS/VX Merger Benefits Committee Committees Communications Committee Contract Contract 2014 Negotiations Blog Council 15 SAN Council 18 LAX (pmAS) Council 19 SEA (pmAS) Council 30 ANC Council 35 SFO Council 39 PDX Council 43 HNL Council 47 LAX/SEA (pmHA) EAP/Professional Standards Committee Extension 2021 Blog Featured Government Affairs Committee Grievance Committee Hotel Committee Human Rights & Equity Committee Industry News Inflight Service Committee Inflight Training Committee JNC Blog Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) Latest News Local Councils Master Executive Council (MEC) Membership Engagement Committee Message from the MEC President Mobilization Committee Negotiations Pairing Construction Preferential Bidding System (PBS) Press Releases Reserve Committee Retirement Committee Scheduling Committee Uniform Committee
        • Email
        • Facebook
        • Instagram
        • YouTube

        Want To Stay In The Loop?

        Stay up-to-date on AFA Alaska + Hawaiian news and information by signing up for our email and text message updates. Click a button below to get started or update your preferences if you're already a subscriber.
        Sign Up for Emails
        Sign Up for Text Updates

        Connect With AFA

        • Contact Us
        • Online Support Center
        • AFA International
        • CWA
        • AFA Alaska + Hawaiian Social Media Guidelines
        • AFA-CWA Mutual Respect Policy

        Copyright © 2013-2026 Alaska/Hawaiian Airlines Master Executive Council, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO