AFA Alaska + Hawaiian

Representing the Flight Attendants of Alaska + Hawaiian

Click here to report an issue to AFA
Menu
  • Local Councils
    • Anchorage (Council 30)
      • Officers
      • Committees
    • Honolulu (Council 43)
      • Officers
      • Committees
    • Los Angeles (Council 18 pmAS)
      • Officers
      • Committees
      • Los Angeles/Seattle (Council 47 pmHA)
        • Officers
      • Portland (Council 39)
        • Officers
        • Committees
      • San Diego (Council 15)
        • Officers
        • Committees
        • Seattle (Council 19 pmAS)
          • Officers
          • Committees
        • San Francisco (Council 35)
          • Officers
          • Committees

        • More About Local Councils >>
        Close
      • Master Executive Council
        • Officers
        • Close
      • Committees
          • Air Safety, Health, & Security (ASHSC)
            • Air Quality
          • Benefits
          • Communications
          • Employee Assistance Program & Professional Standards
          • Government Affairs
          • Grievance
          • Hotel
          • Human Rights & Equity
          • Inflight Service
          • Inflight Training
          • Membership
          • Membership Engagement
          • Reserve
          • Retirement
          • Scheduling
            • Pairing Construction
            • Preferential Bidding System (PBS)
          • Uniform

        • More About Committees >>
        Close
      • Contract
          • Contract Home
            • 2025 Alaska Contract
            • 2025 Hawaiian Contract Extension
            • Ask Contract Questions
          • Contract Resources
          • Alaska Contract Negotiations (2022-2025)
        • Close
      • Resources
          • What To Do If You Encounter Contaminated Cabin Air
          • Issues & Campaigns
          • Newsroom
            • AFA News Now
          • Event Calendar
          • Membership Services
          • New Members
          • About
          • Links
          Close
        • Merger
          • Joint Negotiating Committee
          • Close
        • Contact Us
        You are here: Home / Archives for Negotiations

        Negotiations News Archives

        Negotiations Special Update March 19, 2013

        March 26, 2013 17:54

        March 19, 2013

        Dear Flight Attendants,

        We have received management’s comprehensive compensation package. At this time all we have to report is the proposal is extremely disappointing. We will continue to negotiate improvements and hope to have better news by the end of this week.

        Remember to wear your AFA pin to show your support for the Negotiating Committee!

        In solidarity,

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Paula Mastrangelo

         

        “Four Bases, One Voice”

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=x-w0e0cUGis

        VOICE Comment Card Report March 2013_1_

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        Negotiations Update March 4, 2013: What Are Rigs and Why We Need Them

        March 26, 2013 17:50

        What is a TRIP RIG? What is a DUTY RIG?

        Many airline Flight Attendant contracts have a TRIP RIG and a DUTY RIG. This article will present the basics of what rigs are, and how they can enhance Flight Attendant compensation. Rigs become important when you have lengthy layovers or airport sit time. Compensation for your sequences are paid the GREATER of actual TFP flown, TRIP RIG, DUTY RIG or MINIMUM DUTY PERIOD RIG computations. And a multi-day sequence can be a combination of Actual TFP flown, DUTY RIG, and MINIMUM DUTY PERIOD RIG.

        * * *

        MINIMUM DUTY PERIOD RIG

        You are currently compensated a MINIMUM DUTY PERIOD RIG of 4 TFP for any duty period worked or full calendar day free of duty while on a layover.

        *

        TRIP RIG
        A TRIP RIG is pay credit based on time away from base. This means that from the time you report for duty until the time you are released from duty in domicile equals a quantity of time.
        Let’s look at a 1:4 TRIP RIG. This means that for every 4 hours that you spend away from domicile beginning at check in until release time at your domicile, you are paid one TFP at your specified rate. Here is an example as to how a TRIP RIG is calculated.

        Sarah reports for duty at her LAX domicile at 1225 for a 3-day sequence. She flies LAX-PDX-ANC on Day One, arriving ANC at 2048. On Day Two, Sarah flies ANC-SEA arriving at 0450. On Day Three, she departs PDX at 0700 and arrives back at her LAX home domicile at 0929, and after her 30 minute debrief time is released at 0959. Her total time away from base (TAFB) has been 69 hours 34 minutes. To calculate the TRIP RIG pay and credit you divide the 69 hrs 34 mins divided by 4 = 17.4 TFP (TAFB / 4 = TFP Pay & Credit).
        Here is how TFP pay and credit would be calculated for the example TRIP RIG above if we achieve rigs in our contract and how they work to your benefit. Remember you would receive the greater of the actual TFP flown, DUTY RIG, TRIP RIG, or MINIMUM DUTY PERIOD RIG assuming all those rigs were in place.

        Day 1 Report 1225            Actual TFP          DUTY RIG           TRIP RIG

        LAX-PDX 1325-1550         2.4

        PDX-ANC 1755-2048       4.3                         7.1

        Day 2 Report 2345

        ANC-SEA 0030-0450        4.0                        3.2(4.0 min)

        Day 3

        SEA-LAX 0700-0929         4.0                         2.8(4.0 min)_________________

        TAFB 6934 Release 0959

        14.7                       15.1                      17.4

        Today you would be paid the actual 14.7 TFP but a TRIP RIG would pay you 17.4 TFP. The TRIP RIG formula equates to an 18% increase in pay and credit value for this 3-day sequence.

        *

        DUTY RIGS

        A DUTY RIG is pay credit based on the amount of time that you spend on duty. Let’s look at DUTY RIG example.

        Jessica reports for her trip in SEA at 1300, and departs at 1400 for SFO. She arrives at 1619 in SFO and has a 3:01airport sit time. She then departs for SEA at 1920, arriving at 2116, with a release time of 2146. Her total duty period has been 8 hours 46 minutes. If the DUTY RIG that her contract offers is .75 TFP per each duty hour. This would mean that for every one hour that Jessica spends on duty, from the time of check in until release she will be paid .75 TFP of her current TFP rate of compensation. In this case, we would multiply 8.75 hours by .0.75. (Hours on duty x .75 TFP per hour = TFP pay and credit.) Jessica would receive 6.6 TFP credit at her rate of pay for this duty period using a DUTY RIG computation. Today this SFO turn with a three hour airport sit would pay and credit you 4.2 TFP….. with the DUTY RIG formula this equates to a 56% increase to pay and credit for this sequence.
        1 day turn Report 1300         Actual TFP          DUTY RIG           TRIP RIG

        SEA-SFO 1400-1619             2.1

        SFO-SEA 1920-2116             2.1_______________________________

        TAFB 846 Release 2146

        4.2                         6.6                        2.2
        1 day turn Report 0540

        ANC-ADQ 0640-0745            1.0

        ADQ-ANC 0835-1339            1.0

        ANC-BET 1223-1339             1.4

        BET-ANC 1432-1539             1.4___________________________________

        TAFB 959 Release 1609

        4.8                         7.4                        2.5
        This example of a DUTY RIG calculation for a one-day turn out of ANC shows a 54% increase in pay and credit above the actual you are paid today

        * * *

        Rigs will pay you for the unproductive time you spend sitting at airports or on long layovers with little actual flight time, such as 3-day sequences which are only worth 8.0 TFP. Hopefully these explanations of rigs will give you a better understanding how important it is we achieve them in our next contract.

        In solidarity,

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

         

        “Four Bases, One Voice”

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        Negotiations Update March 2, 2013: More About the S12 TA – Open Time

        March 26, 2013 17:48

        March 2, 2013

        Dear Flight Attendants,

        The Master Executive Council (MEC) and the Negotiating Committee continue to hear rumors, confusion and frustration surrounding the provisions in the Section 12 Exchange of Sequences Tentative Agreement specific to Open Time. Many of the concerns focus on the stepped opening of trading by seniority quartiles, or the Quartile System. The intent of the new system is NOT about dividing us along seniority lines. It is about creating a system that is functional for all Flight Attendants. Understandably, upon initial view the Quartile System seems to penalize junior employees. However, the Negotiating Committee believes that is NOT the case when the entire system and all the changes are considered.

        *

        Let’s review the current Open Time system:

        • Pre-funded with no less than 25% of FA base population in TFP of unawarded (undesirable) trips
        • Opens with 12 days open for 24 hours, almost always “checker-boarded” to prevent repositioning of days
        • In order to trade out of any of the days in a sequence, those days must be open in OT
        • Management can close any day at their discretion
        • If you want to trade a trip for another trip with less legs, there can only be a 3-leg difference
        • OT is essentially closed and locked up 24 hours after it opens

        The current OT system is broken. We can all agree on that.

        *

        Before we even discuss the Quartile System, lets look at the other improvement in the proposed Open Time system:

        • No pre-funding of Open Time, so there will be more Lineholders who will have their lines built with these trips; this will also result in less Reserves. (There has been no contractual increase to the line average so everybody else should not be required to fly more to absorb these trips.)
        • OT opens on the 15th (earlier than today) with NO days closed initially.
        • FAs can simply DROP a trip into OT if the day of the trip departure is open without having to pick a trip up.
        • All days of the trip (say a 4-day) do NOT have to be open, just the first day in order to drop the trip into OT.
        • Concrete, contractual thresholds for closing an OT day (not management discretion).
        • The only trips considered into the OT closing threshold are FA drops and coupon drops (coded TR and CP in eMaestro)
        • If you want to trade a trip on a closed day, there is no 3-leg difference restriction like today
        • If a FA picks up a TR or CP trip on a “closed” day, that day will reopen
        • Complete transparency so you can see if a day is open or closed and why

        *

        Now let’s tackle the Quartile System…

        **Once a quartile opens, it does NOT close**
        The current system encourages Flight Attendants to trade their low-quality trips into OT and it quickly becomes clogged up with these trips and closes. By employing a stepped access to OT by seniority, it slows the process down and results in better quality trips being placed in OT first (because those trips are more likely to be awarded to more senior FAs). Then when the next quartile opens, those FAs get a crack at higher quality trips than they would have normally held or have access to in OT today. Finally, when the last quartile opens, the assumption is that even the Flight Attendants that quartile will initially have access to better quality trips in OT than they would have held on their lines or have access to in OT today.

        We are not trying to restrict any one seniority range. The Quartile System is in place only for the first 4 days of the opening of OT (15th – 18th of the month prior). The new system allows for an orderly and rational opening of OT trading. Not the mad, dysfunctional rush that it is now.

        We ask you to consider the changes in their entirety and to make your judgment based on all the elements of the new system and who this fits into the overall tentative agreement.

        In solidarity,

        Your Negotiating committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

         

        “Four Bases, One Voice”

         

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        Negotiations Update February 27, 2013: Recap of S12 TA – Open Time

        March 26, 2013 17:46

        Open Time Recap

        We have negotiated changes to the OT system which we believe will prevent, or greatly reduce, OT becoming bogged down by those unappealing trips (4-day GDLs, 3-day trips worth 8 TFP, etc). The new quartile system is anticipated to return some scheduling flexibility and make OT a more functioning system. Setting strict threshold numbers for the closing of OT days will also preclude management from arbitrarily closing OT days. These important changes to the OT system are explained below.

        Quartile System for OT Start

        After bid awards, OT will open based on a stepped quartile system. Flight Attendants may trade with or drop to other Flight Attendants in an opened quartile as well as interact with Open Time. On the 18th of the month prior to the bid month, all Flight Attendants have full access to trading/ dropping. Flight Attendants will have access to OT trading and dropping according to the table below:

        Day of month Quartile FAs who can trade (seniority)

        15th 1st Quartile top 25%

        16th 2nd Quartile top 50%

        17th 3rd Quartile top 75%

        18th 4th Quartile All FAs in domicile

        Formula for determining OT Closing Threshold #

        • 1 sequence departure per day for every 200 FAs in domicile. If there are at least 50 FAs “left over” after the calculation, then an additional daily sequence departure is added. (Example: 650 FAs in domicile, OT Threshold number would be 4 sequences.)
        • Minimum threshold # of 3 sequences at each domicile regardless of FA domicile population.
        • Only the day of departure will count toward the threshold number.
        • Sick calls do not count. Only FA-dropped trips and coupon drops count (these trips will be coded TR or CP in eMaestro).
        • If an Open Time day is closed, it can re-open if a FA picks up a sequence coded TR or CP on that day.
        • System adjust for growth.

         

        EXAMPLE: PDX (Threshold # = 3)

        June # of Sequences

        4th 3 closed

        5th 3 closed

        6th 2

        7th 1

        8th 3 closed

        9th 2

        10th 1

        11th 2

        12th 3 closed

        Using the above snapshot of OT, PDX FAs could drop a total of 2 trips into OT on the 7th and 10th and a total of 1 trip on the 6th, 9th, and 11th. Alternatively, if a FA picked up a TR- or CP-coded trip on the 4th, 5th, 8th or 12th, that day would re-open for give-away. Even if a day is closed, a sequence may be traded for another sequence with the same departure day regardless of trip length provided the FA has not traded more than 40 net TFP into OT.

        IMPORTANT: In order to drop a trip into OT, only the departure day of the sequence has to be open. So, in the above example, a FA could drop a 4-day on the 11th of the month, even though the 12th was closed. Also, the 3-leg restriction for trades on closed days is eliminated.

        Other important provisions:

        • OT will open on the 15th with NO closed days
        • NO pre-funding of OT

        – will create more line holders (because TFP previously used in pre-funding will be built into lines)

        – many fewer “low quality” trips will be in OT at the start

        • Straight drops into OT will be allowed (is not today) if sequence departure day is open (up to 40 TFP net into OT per FA)
        • More “higher quality” trips will be available to more junior FAs

         

        The changes in our Open Time System tentative agreement are comprehensive and sweeping. The stagnation created by the current system was untenable and could not continue. Many carriers in our industry (Hawaiian, USAirways East, American, Piedmont and American Eagle, to name some) incorporate some aspect of seniority-based trading in processing OT transactions.

        It is completely understandable that change of this significance would cause concern. However, your Negotiating Committee has not entered into this new system lightly. Countless hours of pouring through data, running through scenarios, and researching what’s out there in our industry has led us to strongly believe that this new system will benefit our Flight Attendant group as a whole.

        In solidarity,

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

         

        “Four Bases, One Voice”

        Filed Under: Latest News, Negotiations

        Pay Is Great, But Scope Is Just As Important

        March 26, 2013 17:43

         

        Pay Is Great, But Scope Is Just As Important

        What Is Scope?

        Scope provisions in contracts provide Job Security . Scope lays out exactly what work is ours to do and guarantees that it will not be performed by anyone else – only those on the System Seniority List. In its purest form, Scope is quite straightforward: Commonly, it’s referred to as the “All Flying” provisions and looks something like this:

        “All flying performed by or for [airline name] will be flown by the Flight Attendants in the service of/ on the System Seniority List of [airline name].”

        Not very exciting stuff, but it is an essential cornerstone around which all other contract provisions are built. If we didn’t have our jobs, the rest of the Contract would not matter so much

        Why is it Important?

        In today’s airline industry, our jobs security is under attack through mergers, capacity purchase agreements (CPAs) and code-share agreements. One consequence of management using these tools is that it is possible for flying/work to be siphoned away from the mainline carrier to other carriers whose workers are paid less and have much more lax work rules. They can do the flying cheaper. Arguably, management need to be flexible to right-size equipment to loads and develop routes and markets. However, we must realize that this presents a risk to our Job Security and limits must be put in place.

        Capacity Purchase Agreements (CPAs)

        This is normally an agreement between a legacy/ large airline and an independent (or wholly-owned) carrier that stipulates an amount of work that will be performed by the CPA (or contracted) carrier. This is normally a “fee for departure” arrangement and the larger carrier will often times pick up “pass-through” costs such as fuel, catering, and sometimes lease the aircraft or arrange financing. This flying is almost always limited to 76 (or fewer)-seat aircraft, such as the Q400 operated by Horizon Air.

        When the larger airline wants to contract for CPA flying, it sends out “Request for Proposals” (RFPs) to all carriers interested in providing this “fee for flying” work. Basically, this requires all the carriers responding to the RFP to bid against each other. The lowest bidder normally wins the CPA work. Obviously this system encourages a downward pressure on costs/wages.

        Currently, Horizon and SkyWest perform CPA flying for Alaska Air Group. Recently, SkyWest placed orders for 90 seat aircraft and these aircraft will be used for CPA flying – because that is all that SkyWest does. At Alaska mainline, we have seen the amount of CPA flying grow significantly over the past several years. Our goal in these negotiations is to put parameters around CPA flying and to ensure that as Alaska Air Group expands, Alaska mainline grows with it, rather than having our flying taken away and given to CPA carriers.

        Codeshare and Marketing Agreements

        Codeshare agreements allow carriers to expand their route structures and derive other benefits without the capital investment that actually flying those flights would entail. This allows high-level frequent fliers loyal to an airline the ability to maintain benefits and travel on an expanded route structure and enjoy more non-stop city pairs. Alaska is well placed to be a code-share partner that provides west coast presence for its associate airlines. Alaska Airlines is unique in the industry because it enjoys codeshare arrangements with several different partners belonging to different alliances, SkyTeam and OneWorld, and who would normally be competitors. How the codeshare is structured impacts Job Security and needs to be closely monitored.

        Merger Protections

        One just has to look around the industry today to realize the impact of mergers. Mergers of airlines have had a significant impact on the lives and jobs of Flight Attendants. Fortunately, we already have significant language in the Contract governing this situation which spells out how the seniority list would be merged, provisions for negotiating a combined agreement, worker protections and job retention. If Alaska is going to be involved in the on-going industry consolidation, we must be prepared to defend ourselves and our jobs.

        The Fact Is…

        The goal of Scope is to protect the interests of all Alaska Flight Attendants. Looking across the industry, the writing is on the wall: Mergers consolidating workforces, CPA flying encroaching on mainline’s share and code-share agreements blurring the lines separating carriers. We must be pro-active and negotiate protections now that will preserve our jobs in the future.

        In solidarity,

        Your Negotiating Committee – MEC President Jeffrey Peterson, Brian Tracy, Karina Cameron-Fetters, Jake Jones and AFA Staff Negotiator Paula Mastrangelo

         

         

        “Four Bases, One Voice”

        Filed Under: Negotiations

        • « Previous Page
        • 1
        • …
        • 63
        • 64
        • 65
        • 66
        • 67
        • Next Page »

        Need Help?

        Have an issue or concern to report to AFA?  Click here to access the AFA Alaska online support center.

        Latest News

        • AFA News in Review – April 3, 2026
        • Human Rights & Equity Committee Meeting Recap – 1st Quarter 2026
        • Elections Update: Nominations Now Open
        • Nominations Now Open for Council 19 Elections
        • Pre-Merger Hawaiian Inflight Service Committee Update – March 2026
        • President’s Message Regarding Action At BOD
        • AFA News in Review – March 27, 2026
        • Joint Contract Negotiations Session 13 – March 2026
        • Council 39 March 2026 Update
        • Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – March 2026

        Human Rights & Equity Committee Meeting Recap – 1st Quarter 2026

        April 2, 2026

        On Wednesday, March 25, our AFA Human Rights & Equity Committee Chairpersons met to discuss their ongoing activism to raise awareness and create positive change within our workplace and community. Your representatives attending the meeting included Louise Borras (LAX-pmAS), Bruni Agosto-Pinal (LAX-pmHA), Aaron Miller (PDX), Nyachan Chuar (ANC), and Yan Yan Teague (SEA). MEC Human […]

        Pre-Merger Hawaiian Inflight Service Committee Update – March 2026

        March 30, 2026

        Editor’s Note: Our MEC Inflight Service Committee now represents both pre-merger airlines, but management still makes service decisions that affect each group of Flight Attendants differently. This update covers changes for both Hawaiian- and Alaska-branded flying, but is specific to aircraft flown by pre-merger Hawaiian Airlines crews. As the work of the merger progresses, we […]

        Joint Contract Negotiations Session 13 – March 2026

        March 27, 2026

        Our JNC met this week for three days of collective bargaining with management. The JNC focused on clarifying questions about moving expenses and presented a proposal for Sick Leave, using feedback from Flight Attendants to guide improvements. The Committee is working to incorporate the strongest elements from both contracts to ensure better support for all members.

        Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – March 2026

        March 27, 2026

        This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants On Tuesday, March 24, our pre-merger Alaska AFA Scheduling Committee Chairpersons and Representatives met virtually to discuss their ongoing work to represent our Flight Attendants and push for improvements in our workplace. Representing you at the meeting were Rebekah Olds (ANC), Rita Tillou (SEA), Melodie Anderes (PDX), […]

        Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee Meeting Recap – March 2026

        March 26, 2026

        On Thursday, March 19, our AFA Local Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Chairpersons met to discuss their ongoing work to represent our Flight Attendants and push for improvements in our workplace. Representing you at the meeting were Bradley Young (SFO), Carin Merritt (LAX pmAS), David Lake (SEA pmAS), Deb Wallstrom (ANC), Eva Gatus […]

        Recent Posts

        • AFA News in Review – April 3, 2026
        • Human Rights & Equity Committee Meeting Recap – 1st Quarter 2026
        • Elections Update: Nominations Now Open
        • Nominations Now Open for Council 19 Elections
        • Pre-Merger Hawaiian Inflight Service Committee Update – March 2026
        • President’s Message Regarding Action At BOD
        • AFA News in Review – March 27, 2026
        • Joint Contract Negotiations Session 13 – March 2026
        • Council 39 March 2026 Update
        • Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – March 2026
        • Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee Meeting Recap – March 2026
        • Hawaiian Seattle Domicile Council 43 and Council 47 Meeting Recap
        • 2025-2028 CBA Final Document
        • AFA News in Review – March 20, 2026
        • MEC Town Hall Video and Q&A Recap – March 3, 2026

        Local Councils

        • Anchorage
        • Honolulu
        • Los Angeles (pre-merger Alaska)
        • Los Angeles/Seattle (pre-merger Hawaiian)
        • Portland
        • San Diego
        • San Francisco
        • Seattle (pre-merger Alaska)

        Master Executive Council

        • MEC

        Contract

        • Contract Home

        Committees

        • Air Safety, Health, & Security
        • Benefits
        • Communications
        • EAP/Professional Standards
        • Government Affairs
        • Grievance
        • Hotel
        • Human Rights
        • Inflight Service
        • Membership Engagement
        • Reserve
        • Retirement
        • Scheduling
        • Uniform

        News By Month

        News By Category

        AFA News Now Air Quality Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) AS/HA Merger AS/VX Merger Benefits Committee Committees Communications Committee Contract Contract 2014 Negotiations Blog Council 15 SAN Council 18 LAX (pmAS) Council 19 SEA (pmAS) Council 30 ANC Council 35 SFO Council 39 PDX Council 43 HNL Council 47 LAX/SEA (pmHA) EAP/Professional Standards Committee Extension 2021 Blog Featured Government Affairs Committee Grievance Committee Hotel Committee Human Rights & Equity Committee Industry News Inflight Service Committee Inflight Training Committee JNC Blog Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) Latest News Local Councils Master Executive Council (MEC) Membership Engagement Committee Message from the MEC President Mobilization Committee Negotiations Pairing Construction Preferential Bidding System (PBS) Press Releases Reserve Committee Retirement Committee Scheduling Committee Uniform Committee
        • Email
        • Facebook
        • Instagram
        • YouTube

        Want To Stay In The Loop?

        Stay up-to-date on AFA Alaska + Hawaiian news and information by signing up for our email and text message updates. Click a button below to get started or update your preferences if you're already a subscriber.
        Sign Up for Emails
        Sign Up for Text Updates

        Connect With AFA

        • Contact Us
        • Online Support Center
        • AFA International
        • CWA
        • AFA Alaska + Hawaiian Social Media Guidelines
        • AFA-CWA Mutual Respect Policy

        Copyright © 2013-2026 Alaska/Hawaiian Airlines Master Executive Council, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO