AFA Alaska

Representing the Flight Attendants of Alaska + Hawaiian

Click here to report an issue to AFA
You are here: Home / Archives for Master Executive Council (MEC)

AFA Alaska Update – October 15, 2021

In This Edition

  • System Board of Adjustment Interviews
  • Reminder: Zika Letter of Agreement
  • Understanding Panic Disorder

System Board of Adjustment Interviews

Master Executive Council (MEC)

The Master Executive Council (MEC) will be conducting interviews for one (1) member to serve on the AFA System Board of Adjustment.

Scope

Members are to serve on the System Board of Adjustment for the purpose of arbitrating any disputes or grievances that may arise under the terms of the Agreement between Alaska Airlines and its Flight Attendants.

Policy/Responsibilities

  • There shall be two members selected by the MEC from active members in good standing to represent the Association.  Members will be selected at-large without regard to Local Council or domicile. 
  • Any person seeking a position as a System Board of Adjustment Member must submit a resume.  Candidates must interview with the MEC.
  • System Board Members shall be selected for a two (2) year appointment period in accordance with the AFA Constitution and Bylaws.  At least one appointment will be reviewed in June of each year.  Selection shall be made, insofar as possible, to ensure that both members will not be new at the same time.  
  • The System Board Members will act in the best interest of the membership and the Association and will be consistent with the Agreement between the Flight Attendants and Alaska Airlines.
  • The MEC President shall have the ability, in the event of an emergency, to appoint a qualified member in good standing to fill an ad hoc position on the Board, should the alternate not be available.
  • The MEC on an ad hoc basis, by majority vote, may appoint an expert as a substitute for one member of the System Board of Adjustment.

Qualifications

  • Current Alaska Airlines Flight Attendant
  • Willingness to attend the requisite grievance training(s)
  • In depth knowledge of the contract
  • Understanding of the principles of just cause
  • Adherence to Grievance Committee policies, procedures, and standards of ethical conduct
  • Ability to maintain confidentiality of sensitive and personal information
  • Maintenance of member-in-good-standing status
  • Ability to remain in good standing with the company
  • Ability to analyze written data and information with high attention to detail
  • Strong written and communication skills
  • Strong computer skills.

Term of Appointment

The selected candidate will serve the remainder of a term of appointment that concludes on June 30, 2023.

Expressing Interest and Interview Scheduling

The MEC will hold interviews of eligible candidates during the December Regular MEC Meeting on December 7, 2021.  If you’re interested in interviewing, plan to bid around this date or adjust your schedule accordingly to accommodate.  All interviews will be conducted using Google Meet videoconferencing.

Interested candidates should submit an expression of interest and resume using the online expression of interest form.  The deadline for submissions is 5 PM Pacific time on Tuesday, November 30, 2021.  After the submission deadline, MEC Secretary-Treasurer Linda Christou will contact eligible candidates to arrange a specific interview time.

Please note that to submit an expression of interest, you must have a Google account.  If you do not have a Google account, you can create one for free at https://accounts.google.com/signup.

Questions?

Any questions regarding the position or application process should be directed to MEC Grievance Committee Chairperson Stephanie Adams at stephanie.adams@afaalaska.org.

Reminder: Zika Letter of Agreement

Grievance Committee

In 2017, AFA and management signed a letter of agreement (LOA) establishing protections for Flight Attendants who are pregnant, attempting to become pregnant, or whose partner is attempting to become pregnant and are scheduled to fly to a Zika-affected area.  The LOA outlines the protective provisions and associated procedures that eligible Flight Attendants are responsible for following.

As Alaska Airlines is beginning service to Belize in November, it is timely that we offer a reminder that this LOA is still active.  Belize is considered a Zika affected area by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) which triggers the protections outlined in the LOA.

Questions?

If you have any questions about the Zika LOA or the procedures associated with using the protective provisions of the LOA, please contact your Local Grievance Committee.

Understanding Panic Disorder

Employee Assistance Program (EAP)/Professional Standards Committee

What is Panic Disorder?

Panic disorder is a psychological condition that shows up in the form of sometimes serious physical symptoms. These symptoms, called panic attacks, can literally make the victim feel as though he or she is dying: rapid heart rate, difficulty breathing, excessive sweating, dizziness, trembling, intense anxiety, a feeling of loss of control, and helplessness. Imagine what it would be like to jump out of an airplane only to find your parachute won’t open – that’s pretty close to what panic attack victims are feeling in the moment.

When the attacks occur regularly or appear to be caused by a specific set of circumstances, then panic disorder is the cause. There is no specific treatment for a panic attack, per se. But the underlying condition, panic disorder, can be treated with a combination of medications and psychotherapy.  

What Causes Panic Disorder?

Like many psychological conditions, panic disorder can originate in many different ways, some of them making little logical sense. A person with a phobia such as fear of heights or enclosed places might experience a panic attack if he or she is in this situation. Alcohol, drugs, and trauma can trigger it.   But the cause itself has no bearing on the reaction to it because the threat felt by the victim is one entirely of perception rather than reality.

What to Do if You Have a Panic Attack

The only way to stop a panic attack is to allow it to end, and the only way to do that is to diminish the underlying fear that causes the symptoms. If you allow yourself to experience the symptoms, with a clear realization that there is no real danger, then the attack may be shortened. Breathe deeply and don’t give in to dangerous impulses such as running away or jumping off something. Know that the effects will pass. The more you experience even the smallest triumph of logic over fear, the less intense your attacks will become.  If the attacks continue, seek help from a medical professional.

What to Do if You See Someone Having a Panic Attack

You may feel pretty helpless when encountering someone having a panic attack.  Tell them to keep breathing and assure them that there is no danger.  The problem here is that the victim will tell you that they are having a heart attack, can’t breathe, or feels like they are about to pass out, and odds are good that you aren’t qualified to assess the reality of that perception. Call for help quickly and do your best to calm the victim until help arrives. The best thing you can do when it’s over is offer comfort, assure the person that professional help is available and encourage them to seek that assistance.

Questions or Need Help?

Our AFA EAP Committee is available to provide assistance with referrals.  Please call (949) 470-0493 or visit afaalaska.org/eap for contact information.

Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies – Part 3

Master Executive Council (MEC) and Grievance Committee

Click here for Part 2 >

Click here for Part 1 >

In This Update

  • Forgiveness of §32 Attendance Points Assessed for September COVID-19 Workplace Exposure Quarantines
  • Grievance No. 36-99-2-241-21 “Violation of §32 Attendance Policy/COVID-19”
  • Management Unwilling to Offer or Negotiate School/Childcare Exposure Absence Mitigations
  • Applying for Medical or Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs Exemptions to the Vaccination Mandate
  • Reasonable Accommodations for Approved Exemptions
  • Employees Currently on a Continuous Leave of Absence
  • Non-Compliance

Forgiveness of §32 Attendance Policy Points Assessed for September COVID-19 Workplace Exposure Quarantines

AFA and management have reached an agreement to forgive all Section 32 Attendance Policy points that were assessed for any COVID-19 workplace exposure quarantines that began in the month of September. Otherwise, Section 32 Attendance Policy points potentially apply (unless reduced by Quarterly Point Reduction) for any Flight Attendants on a workplace exposure quarantine who disclosed that they were not fully vaccinated or who declined to disclose their vaccination status during the contact tracing intake conversation with management related to that workplace exposure. Management is currently working on implementing the points forgiveness, so Flight Attendants should expect to be notified of an adjustment in the coming weeks.

Grievance No. 36-99-2-241-21 “Violation of §32 Attendance Policy/COVID-19”

Although the one-time agreement above resolves points accrued in the month of September, unvaccinated or “decline to disclose vaccination status” Flight Attendants are potentially accruing points for COVID-19 workplace exposure quarantines going forward beginning October 1st. Consequently, AFA has filed Grievance No. 36-99-2-241-21 “Violation of §32 Attendance Policy/COVID-19”:

The Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §32 [Attendance Policy], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when on or about October 1, 2021, it unilaterally imposed an inequitable non-contractual policy of administering absences for Company-mandated COVID-19 workplace exposure quarantines under the Section 32 Attendance Policy solely to Flight Attendants who are classified as “unvaccinated” pursuant to Company policy, and thereby, potentially subjecting these Flight Attendants to disciplinary action up to and including termination resulting from such attendance points accrual. Vaccinated Flight Attendants do not accrue attendance points under this unilaterally imposed Company policy.

Management Unwilling to Offer or Negotiate School/Childcare Exposure Absence Mitigations

AFA has made several attempts to advocate to management for the need to offer or negotiate school/childcare COVID-19 exposure absence mitigations for Flight Attendants. It is extremely disappointing that management’s position regarding relief not just for FAs but for all employees with school age children is that you’re essentially on your own to manage your schedule and to do your best to not get fired for absences related to school/childcare quarantines. Is this doing the right thing?

Reminder: Flight Attendants may call out Sick Child if their child is ill, and they will not accrue attendance points if the Flight Attendant has sufficient sick leave to cover the entire absence. No attendance points apply for time off to care for a sick child unless the Flight Attendant does not have enough sick leave to cover the absence. See Bulletin #2021-0059 for more information about the Company’s application in these circumstances. Please note aspects of this application remains in dispute via ongoing litigation.

Applying for Medical or Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs Exemptions to the Vaccination Mandate

Management is now accepting requests for reasonable accommodation for medical conditions and/or sincerely held religious beliefs that prevents employees from getting vaccinated against COVID-19. An employee may apply for one or both if they qualify. The entire accommodations process (e.g., requests, review, determination, and administration) is directly between employer and employee. For liability reasons, AFA cannot and will not be a party to this process, but we will communicate what we know when possible. 

Medical exemptions

Management is requiring signed and dated medical documentation from a healthcare provider that indicates the medical reason for the exemption request. Applications lacking the required information will be denied. 

Click here to submit a request for medical accommodation (AAG SSO required) >

Sincerely held religious beliefs exemptions

Management does not require separate documentation to substantiate an exemption request for sincerely held religious beliefs, but you may attach additional documentation if you so choose. Management may also ask for additional supporting information.

Click here to submit a request for religious accommodation (AAG SSO required) >

Reasonable Accommodations for Approved Exemptions

Unpaid leaves or regular COVID-19 testing?

AFA has received numerous inquiries whether the reasonable accommodation will be an unpaid leave or regular COVID-19 testing. Management has indicated a strong desire to keep as many employees working as possible. The reality is the Company would have an extremely challenging time working through a staffing shortage in mid-December and beyond in almost every division. However, there are serious concerns and questions about how regular testing would be administered, and it is unclear if there will be a reliable supply of accessible COVID tests. 

Potential seniority violations?

There could conceivably be multiple forms of accommodation both within and between workgroups. Accommodations are usually granted and administered on a case-by-case basis, so this is yet another unprecedented situation courtesy of the pandemic. We are currently working with AFA Legal to determine how much influence the Association might have over the administration of multiple accommodations within the Flight Attendant group if those accommodations potentially create seniority violations.

Appealing and/or disputing a reasonable accommodation request

AFA has also received numerous inquiries how to appeal and/or dispute an approved accommodation request—particularly if the accommodation is an unpaid leave. Any request for appeal or a dispute arising from the accommodation process—regardless of whether an exemption is approved or denied—should be directed back to the employer by the employee. If the parties cannot reach a mutually acceptable resolution, then the employee should file a complaint with the appropriate government agency that owns regulatory oversight for that accommodation.  For a complaint related to a medical accommodation, an ADA complaint falls under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.  Complaints related to religious accommodations fall under the authority of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC).

Employees Currently on a Continuous Leave of Absence

Management has indicated that employees who are currently on a continuous leave of absence will be provided with adequate time to be vaccinated or request a reasonable accommodation upon their return to work and the associated deadline will be extended accordingly.

Non-Compliance

Finally, the big question: What happens if a Flight Attendant does not file for or is denied an exemption, and the Flight Attendant declines to be vaccinated? It is still too early to say with certainty because management is still developing the policy, but it seems very likely that management will pursue termination of employment if the employee cannot comply.  Despite this possibility, there is no firm direction from management at this time.

AFA will continue to monitor and provide updates as management offers clarification and/or additional information becomes available.  

Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies – Part 2

Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies – Part 2

Master Executive Council (MEC) and Grievance Committee

Click here for Part 1 >

In This Update

  • Presidential Executive Order Vaccination Mandate

Presidential Executive Order Vaccination Mandate

Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air are government contractors and their employees subject to the related vaccination requirements under the Presidential Executive Order

As you have almost certainly heard by now, Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air have determined that they are federal contractors and therefore their employees are subject to the vaccination requirements under the Presidential Executive Order. See the Company email to all employees “Important information about required vaccinations“ (September 30, 2021) for more information. Southwest, American, JetBlue and other airlines have likewise determined that the mandate applies to them.

What does this mean for Air Group?

First and foremost, vaccine mandates are legal and constitutional. The government has a compelling interest in public health, and the United States Supreme Court has upheld vaccination mandates in the past. Under the Executive Order (EO), all Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air employees will be required to be fully vaccinated or have an approved exemption on file as early as December 8, 2021 (unless this date subsequently gets pushed).

Immunity from a prior COVID-19 infection is not sufficient under the mandate. To be considered fully vaccinated prior to that date, your last Pfizer or Moderna shot, or your single Johnson & Johnson shot, must be no later than November 24, 2021.  Regular testing under the EO is not considered an adequate substitute unless it is part of an accommodation for an approved exemption on file for substantiated medical reasons or a sincerely held religious belief.

Medical / Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) exemptions

If you are unable to receive any of the available vaccines for medical reasons, your employer must attempt to reasonably accommodate your disability.  An accommodation can involve making changes to your work environment to protect you and others, a long-term leave, or perhaps something in between, such as regular testing. The actual accommodation would depend both on the disability and the workplace and nature of the business. An employer is not required to make any particular accommodation you request, or to make an accommodation that would cause an undue hardship, which means great expense, inconvenience or disruption of the workplace. Alaska and Horizon management have not yet informed us how they intend to accommodate medical exemptions, or what medical evidence they will require to establish an exemption. Medical exemptions are rare, as most people can well-tolerate the COVID-19 vaccines.

Sincerely held religious belief exemptions

If an employee states that he or she has a sincerely held religious objection to vaccination, the employer must generally accept this as true—even if the religion (or other moral belief) is unfamiliar to the employer. However, employers are entitled to question and probe the belief, and may consider factors such as:

  • Whether the employee has behaved in a manner markedly inconsistent with the professed belief;
  • Whether the accommodation sought is a particularly desirable benefit that is likely to be sought for secular reasons; 
  • Whether the timing of the request renders it suspect (e.g., it follows an earlier request by the employee for the same benefit for secular reasons); and 
  • Whether the employer otherwise has reason to believe the accommodation is not sought for religious reasons.

Proof of vaccination

The vaccine mandate requires the Company to collect proof of vaccination from all employees who do not have a medical or religious exemption. You will not simply be able to attest that you have been vaccinated; you will be required to show one of the following:

  • A copy of the record of immunization from a health care provider or pharmacy;
  • A copy of the COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card;
  • A copy of medical records documenting the vaccination;
  • A copy of immunization records from a public health or state immunization information system; or
  • A copy of any other official documentation verifying vaccination with information on the vaccine name, date(s) of administration, and the name of health care professional or clinic site administering the vaccine.

Data privacy and HIPAA

This information is not protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), because employers such as Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air are not covered entities under HIPAA. According to the latest guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the employer does, however, have an obligation to safeguard this as confidential medical information under the ADA that must be stored separately from the employee’s personnel file.

AFA leaders will be meeting with management soon to gain clarity on how the Executive Order will be administered. The bottom line is that the mandate does apply to us under federal law, and we cannot negotiate around it or grieve it.  AFA will continue to advocate on behalf of the entire membership and to fairly represent all Flight Attendants throughout these challenging times.

Stay tuned for more updates.

Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 3

Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 3

Master Executive Council (MEC), Grievance Committee, Benefits Committee

This is the third in a series reporting on management’s opposition to various state and local laws, the latest developments to complex state law litigations related to these laws that are playing out in Washington and California, and what Flight Attendants can do about it.

Read Part 2 here >

Read Part 1 here >

In This Edition

  • WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)
  • CA 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)

Management will unilaterally decline to initiate payroll deductions for flight crew in January 2022

The Washington Cares Fund is the nation’s first state-administered long-term care insurance program. Benefits will be funded by a 0.58% employee-paid payroll tax beginning January 1, 2022. However, Alaska Airlines management has unilaterally taken the position that the WA Cares Fund does not apply to flight crew and therefore will not initiate payroll deductions this coming January. In an email titled “Important Information About Washington’s Long-Term Care Act” (July 8, 2021), management advised all WA-domiciled Alaska Airlines Flight Attendants that flight crew may still consider pursuing a permanent one-time opt-out of the Program and all associated taxes and benefits by obtaining private long-term care insurance prior to the deadline of November 1, 2021. Currently, there is no opt-out option for any employee who becomes domiciled in (i.e., employed in) Washington after the applicable deadlines.

If management will not deduct flight crew contributions, then why bother opting out?

Flight Attendants may eventually change jobs within the Company (i.e., transfer to another position that is not classified as flight crew) or work for other employers within Washington. Additionally, the Company’s position regarding flight crew is currently untested from a legal perspective. It is entirely possible that the courts may eventually require Alaska Airlines to withhold WA Cares Fund payroll contributions on behalf of flight crew.

Grossly unfair to non-resident employees

Although all WA-domiciled flight crew would otherwise theoretically be required to contribute to the fund (except for management’s unilateral position regarding flight crew and certain state and local laws), only Washington residents may utilize Care Fund benefits. This is grossly unfair to non-resident flight crew (i.e., out of state commuters). Consequently, AFA Alaska agrees with and supports ALPA Alaska in filing legal objections with Washington State regarding concerns that the WA Cares Fund violates the Dormant Commerce Clause, which is inferred from Article I of the US Constitution, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause, which is derived from Article IV, Section 2 of the US Constitution. Resolution under this path could take a very long time, so this is another reason that non-resident WA-domiciled flight crew might consider opting out if possible.

Challenges with opting out

Unfortunately, it is extremely challenging to opt out unless you started applying for private insurance many, many months ago—especially if you are younger. AFA is unaware of any private insurers who are currently offering new long-term care policies. Additionally, there is a significant administrative backlog of applications with all known private insurers, so it is very concerning—and unknown—whether all pending policies will be executed prior to the November 1st deadline.

Will I be required to directly contribute to the WA Cares Fund or pay back contributions not made on my behalf?

Quite simply, it is unclear but doubtful. Again, AFA Alaska agrees with and supports ALPA Alaska filing legal objections with Washington State regarding concerns that the WA Cares Fund raises due process problems insofar as the law does not specify who bears consequences for an employer’s failure to remit employee premiums or what those consequences would be. However, there is no mechanism for employees to make direct contributions to the WA Care Fund, and there is no provision in the law to recoup contributions not withheld and made by the employer.

Interestingly, Alaska Airlines management personnel from the People Team (i.e., Human Resources) have advised individual Flight Attendants who have directly inquired with them that the Company would “likely” be required to pay back the contributions owed on behalf of flight crew if Washington State came back and said that flight crew are required to pay such contributions. This is presumably under a scenario in which the State of Washington prevailed in the courts pursuant to this almost-inevitable dispute. However, Alaska Airlines management has not responded to the Association’s inquiry to confirm such guidance prior to publication of this update.

Estimated (theoretical) contributions

$25k gross annual earnings = ~$12/month | $50k gross annual earnings = ~$24/month | $75k gross annual earnings = ~$36/month | $100k gross annual earnings = ~$48/month

CA 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

Up to 80 paid hours for certain COVID-19 related absences from a separate employer-paid sick bank

One of the more notable temporary COVID-19 laws is California’s 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave. The law was effective as of March 29, 2021, was retroactive to January 1, 2021, and ends soon on September 30, 2021.  It states that California employees will be paid up to 80 hours by the employer rather than through the employee’s own sick leave bank for COVID-19 related quarantines, vaccination appointments and vaccine symptoms. Click here for FAQs. Thus far, management has denied all requests from Flight Attendants to comply with the law, e.g., to pay out of the separate COVID-19 sick bank.  

Filing a claim

Any CA-domiciled Flight Attendant who has used Sick Leave for COVID-19 related absences between January 1st and September 30th should file a claim or a report of a labor law violation with the Labor Commissioner’s Office, which is the state agency charged with enforcement. Please file a claim as soon as possible, but our understanding is that the state accepts such claims for up to three years. Flight Attendants also always have the option to hire their own attorney at their own expense if so desired.

AFA Alaska representatives are here to help

Although AFA cannot represent any FAs regarding such claims, we would very much appreciate you keeping us posted on any developments. Outside counsel has already responded to some claims with very official-looking but in our opinion not entirely on point legalese. AFA Alaska representatives are more than willing to help by supplying basic information and tips, and we would cooperate with any requests from claim investigators. Do not let management’s legal tactics put you off from pressing forward with your rightful claim!

Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 2

Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 2

Master Executive Council (MEC), Grievance Committee, Benefits Committee

This is the second in a series reporting on management’s opposition to various state and local laws, the latest developments to complex state law litigations related to these laws that are playing out in Washington and California, and what Flight Attendants can do about it.

Read Part 1 here >

In This Edition

  • Definition of Sick Family/Sick Child
  • Applicable State Laws
  • Filing a Claim with the Appropriate Agency

Most Liberal of the Flight Attendant Domicile State Laws Definition of “Sick Family/Sick Child”

The Roberts Decision and LOA 5 Sick Family/Sick Child

AFA arbitrated Grievance No. 36-99-02-49-03 “Family Leave Benefits” in 2005, which resulted in a favorable ruling for AFA by now-deceased Arbitrator Thomas Roberts. This award, which is usually referenced as “The Roberts Decision” by AFA and management, was at least in part subsequently incorporated into the current contract via Letter of Agreement 5 “Sick Family/Sick Child”:

[W]henever the collective-bargaining agreement refers to a sick child, it is understood that this is a placeholder for “family member.” With the Association’s agreement, the Company will apply the most liberal of the laws of the states in which Flight Attendants are domiciled in determining the appropriate definition of “family member.” When this definition is determined, including any subsequent amendments pursuant to changes in the law or in the interpretation of the law, the Company will publish the definition and distribute it to the Flight Attendants.

Through arbitration and bargaining, the Company is required to apply the most liberal of the Flight Attendant domicile state laws definition of “family member” for whom a Flight Attendant may utilize sick leave to care for that individual, under what circumstances and whether Flight Attendants will receive points under the Attendance Policy for such absences.

Updated list of qualified family members for Sick Family/Sick Child (as of August 30, 2021)

“Family member” includes: • Spouse • Registered domestic partner • Child (biological, step, adopted, foster, legal ward, or registered domestic partner’s child) of any age • Parent (biological, adoptive, step, foster, parent-in-law, or registered domestic partner’s parent) • Legal guardian of the F/A, spouse, or registered domestic partner as a minor • Individual with whom the F/A has or had an in loco parentis relationship – persons in loco parentis are those with day-to-day responsibilities to care for or financially support a child, or who had such responsibility for the employee when the employee was a child • Grandparent • Grandchild • Sibling

Points for Sick Family/Sick Child (in dispute)

Generally, no points apply for time off to care for the above individuals unless the Flight Attendant does not have enough sick leave to cover the absence. See Bulletin #2021-0059 for more information about the Company’s application in these circumstances. Please note this application remains in dispute via ongoing litigation.

Applicable State Laws

Summary

✅ = Honored | ⚠ = Partially honored and/or in dispute | 🚫 = Denied

State laws that AFA believes should apply to flight crew include but are not limited to:

  • Washington
    • WA Family Care Act (WFCA) – 🚫
    • WA Paid Sick Leave (WPSL) – 🚫
    • WA Paid Family Leave (WPFL) – 🚫
    • WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund) – 🚫
  • Oregon
    • OR Family Leave Act (OFLA) – 🚫
    • OR Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance (PFMLI) – N/A
  • California
    • CA State Disability Insurance (CASDI) – ✅
    • CA Family Rights Act (CFRA) – 🚫
    • CA Family School Partnership Act – 🚫
  • All
    • Wage statement laws: AK, WA, OR – ✅; CA = ⚠
    • Supplemental/temporary COVID-19 leave laws – 🚫

Washington

WA Family Care Act (WFCA)

  • Reference:  RCW 49.12
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs:  Use of accrued vacation pay to care for qualified family members under certain conditions.
  • Status:  State of WA & AFA won lawsuit in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals; however, the Company continues to appeal at state level.
  • AS Compliance: No
  • Contact Information:  Washington State Department of Labor and Industries | Mailing Address: PO Box 44000 Olympia, WA  98504-4000 | Phone:  360-902-5800 | Website:  www.lni.wa.gov –> For Workers –> File a Workplace Complaint

WA Paid Sick Leave (WPSL)

  • Reference:  Initiative 1433
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: (1) Employees can use sick leave for preventative care for themselves and/or applicable family members. (2) Discipline and infractions that may lead to discipline (including Attendance Points) cannot be assessed for use of paid SL. (3) Employees can use paid SL on the 90th calendar day of employment (i.e., during FA probationary period).
  • Status:  A4A is appealing summary judgment motion in favor of State of WA & AFA.  The State of WA won in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals; however, the Company continues to appeal.
  • AS Compliance: No
  • Contact Information: Washington State Department of Labor and Industries | Mailing Address: PO Box 44000 Olympia, WA  98504-4000 | Phone:  360-902-5800 | Website:  www.lni.wa.gov –> For Workers –> File a Workplace Complaint

WA Paid Family Leave (WPFL)

  • Reference: Builds on FMLA & RCW 50A
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: WPFL is a statewide insurance program that ensures paid family leave for various situations. WPFL usually covers 12 weeks of leave, or up to 18 weeks in certain circumstances, and workers receive between $100 and $1,000 per week depending on their income.
  • Status:  No known disputes currently. – Premiums were to be deducted starting January 1, 2019, and leaves were to be allowed beginning January 1, 2020. 
  • AS Compliance: No
  • Contact Information:  Employment Security Department | Phone:  1-833-717-2273 | Email:  paidleave@esd.wa.gov | Website:paidleave.wa.gov

WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)

  • Reference:  RCW 50B.04
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs:  The WA Cares Fund was created to reduce pressure on the Medicaid system. Once vested, you will be eligible to access a maximum lifetime benefit of $36,500 (adjusted for inflation) to pay for expenses associated with needing assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Unlike private insurance that generally requires you to be unable to do two ADLs, the WA Cares Fund requires that individuals need assistance with three ADLs to qualify. Examples of ADLs: Dressing, bathing, cognitive impairment, and other basic functions of your daily routine. Benefits are not portable or payable if you reside outside of Washington state at the time the benefit is needed.
  • Status:  No known disputes currently. – Paid for by a 0.58% tax on employee wages starting January 1, 2022, with benefits beginning in January 2025.
  • AS Compliance:  No – The Company does not intend to collect premiums.
  • Contact Information:  Washington State Department of Social and Health Services | Email:  wacaresfund@dshs.wa.gov | Website: http://www.wacaresfund.wa.gov/

Oregon

OR Family Leave Act (OFLA)

OR Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance (OPFMLI)

  • Reference:  HB 2005​
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: OPFMLI will provide 12 weeks of paid time off for various circumstances, with weekly benefits capped at $1215. The employee must have earned at least $1,000 in wages during the previous year. This leave will run concurrent with OFLA. 
  • Status: State pushing start date to January 2023 or later
  • AS Compliance:  N/A – Begins in 2023 or later, but AS will likely not follow the law.
  • Contact Information:  Oregon Employment Department | Mailing Address:  875 Union St. NE Salem, OR 97311 | Phone: 503-947-1394 | Email:  paidfamilyandmedicalleave@oregon.gov | Website: https://www.oregon.gov/employ/PFMLI/Pages/default.aspx

California

CA State Disability Insurance (CASDI)

  • Reference:  California Unemployment Insurance Code §2601 et seq.
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs:  Partial wage replacement for non-work disability: illness, injury and/or pregnancy. SDI contributions are paid by California workers covered by the SDI program.
  • Status:  No known disputes currently
  • AS Compliance:  Yes – Since 1987
  • Contact Information:  Employment Development Department | Phone numbers:  English: 1-800-480-3287; and Spanish: 1-866-658-8846 | Website:  https://askedd.edd.ca.gov or https://edd.ca.gov/Disability/SDI_Online.htm

CA Family Rights Act (CFRA)

  • Reference:
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: CFRA includes a generous pregnancy disability leave (PDL) and other family care and medical leave provisions under The Fair Employment and Housing Act. Requires 1250 hours in the prior 12 months. CFRA is like FMLA, but CFRA also covers domestic partner and domestic partner’s children. An employer can require the employee to use vacation pay, but the employee cannot use sick leave if not for the employee’s own medical condition. Health benefits must be continued during the leave if the employer is part of a group plan.
  • Status:  No lawsuits known to AFA at this time.
  • AS Compliance:  No
  • Contact Information:  Department of Fair Employment and Housing | Mailing Address: 2218 Kausen Drive, Suite 100, Elk Grove, CA 95758 | Phone: (800) 884-1684 | Email:  contact.center@dfeh.ca.gov | Website:  http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/

CA Family School Partnership Act

  • Reference:  CA Labor Code 230.8
  • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: Employees may take 8 hours/month up to 40 hours/year to attend any day care or K-12 school function that is sponsored, supervised, or approved by the school, school board, or childcare facility. Time loss may be paid out of vacation pay, compensatory time off (CTO), personal time off or unpaid. Attendance Points may not be assessed for using this leave. Applies to parents, grandparents, or guardians with at least seven days’ notice.
  • Status:  No known disputes currently. – AFA encourages eligible and willing California FAs to request time off under this law and then to file a complaint with the state when denied.
  • AS Compliance:  No
  • Contact Information:  CA Dept of Industrial Relations | Phone Numbers: 1-844-619-8786 or SFO 415-703-5300, LAX 213-620-6330 or SAN 619-220-5451 | Email:  DLSE2@Dir.CA.gov | Website:  https://www.dfeh.ca.gov –> Complaints

Filing a Claim with the Appropriate Agency

AFA cannot file claims on behalf of Flight Attendants, but we’re here to assist

AFA does not have the ‘standing’ to file complaints with state or local agencies on behalf of affected employees–even if those employees are AFA Alaska members. However, we are very much interested in guiding and supporting members to file such complaints. Flight Attendants should reach out to their local AFA Benefits Committee representatives to discuss the law in question, and we will refer you to the applicable state agency so you can file a claim. Flight Attendants should copy an AFA rep into any email correspondence with the state.

Helpful tips

When filing a claim, the Flight Attendant will need to provide evidence of the Company’s refusal to comply with the law. Flight Attendants are encouraged to keep a documentation trail and to file timely as there may be filing timelines. We encourage Flight Attendants to tell any state agency representative that Alaska Airlines is knowingly disregarding the law.  AFA is hopeful that the states will act against Alaska Airlines management directly and compel the Company to comply with applicable state laws.   

In the Next Edition (Publishing Monday)

  • WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)
  • CA 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

Hotel Committee Meeting Recap – December 2025

On Monday, December 1, our AFA Local Hotel Committee Chairpersons met in person in Seattle to receive an update about current layover hotels and transportation providers and discuss concerns with management. Representing you at the meeting were Dori Marron (ANC), Jarod McNeill (SEA), Kelly Hepworth (PDX), Hilary Streem (SFO), Brian Sherill (LAX), and Kanani Vallot […]

MEC Reserve Committee Vice Chairperson—New Hire & Probation Interviews – January 2026

This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants Do you want to help new Flight Attendants as they go through initial training and probation? Our MEC is seeking a dedicated and organized Member in good standing to serve as the MEC Reserve Committee Vice Chairperson—New Hire & Probation. In this role, you’ll be the primary […]

Pre-Merger Alaska MEC Committee Chairperson Election Results

This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants During this week’s MEC Meeting, our MEC held interviews for the next group of pre-merger Alaska MEC Committee Chairperson positions to be elected for the upcoming MEC Officer term. We want to thank everyone who expressed interest in the available positions and their willingness to serve. After […]

Merged MEC Committee Chairperson Election Results

During this week’s MEC Meeting, our MEC held interviews for our next merged MEC Committee Chairperson and Representative positions. We want to thank everyone who expressed interest in the available positions and their willingness to serve. After careful consideration and deliberation, the following candidates have been elected: MEC Inflight Training Committee Chairperson: Megan BrownMEC Inflight Training […]

Recent Posts

News By Month

News By Category

AFA News Now Air Quality Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) AS/HA Merger AS/VX Merger Benefits Committee Committees Communications Committee Contract Contract 2014 Negotiations Blog Council 15 SAN Council 18 LAX (pmAS) Council 19 SEA Council 30 ANC Council 35 SFO Council 39 PDX Council 47 LAX (pmHA) EAP/Professional Standards Committee Extension 2021 Blog Featured Government Affairs Committee Grievance Committee Hotel Committee Human Rights & Equity Committee Industry News Inflight Service Committee Inflight Training Committee JNC Blog Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) Latest News Local Councils Master Executive Council (MEC) Membership Committee Membership Engagement Committee Message from the MEC President Mobilization Committee Negotiations Pairing Construction Preferential Bidding System (PBS) Press Releases Reserve Committee Retirement Committee Scheduling Committee Uniform Committee

Want To Stay In The Loop?

Stay up-to-date on AFA Alaska news and information by signing up for our email and text message updates. Click a button below to get started or update your preferences if you're already a subscriber.
Sign Up for Emails
Sign Up for Text Updates