AFA Alaska + Hawaiian

Representing the Flight Attendants of Alaska + Hawaiian

Click here to report an issue to AFA
You are here: Home / Archives for Master Executive Council (MEC)

Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies

Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies

Master Executive Council (MEC) and Grievance Committee

Summary of Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies

The following is a general summary of what Alaska Airlines management announced in the “Our plan for keeping you and our guests safe from COVID” email that was sent earlier yesterday to all employees regarding the Company’s approach to vaccination and COVID safety measures:

  • No requirement for existing employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19
  • Requirement for new hire employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 -> This was previously communicated via an August 30th email from VP Inflight Travis Gelbrich “Important updates to pay protection and new hire policies,” which also references exceptions for accommodations required by law for medical exemptions or sincerely held religious beliefs
  • $200 incentive if proof of vaccination is submitted byOctober 15, 2021
  • Pay protection for vaccinated employees during any Company-mandated quarantine period for workplace exposure (for Flight Attendants: as defined by the Inflight division’s contact tracing protocol) -> Already communicated earlier in the week via the email from Travis
  • No pay protection for employees who decline to confirm being fully vaccinated for all COVID-related absences including during any Company-mandated quarantine period for workplace exposure (for FAs: as defined by the Inflight division’s contact tracing protocol) -> Already communicated earlier in the week via the email from Travis and confirmed by the updated contact tracing protocol effective September 2, 2021
  • For employees who decline to submit proof of vaccination by November 1st:
    • Regular COVD-19 testing
    • Must always wear a mask regardless of federal, state, and local requirements
    • Mandatory vaccine education program and acknowledgement of the risks of remaining unvaccinated and the protocols to be followed

Duty of Fair Representation

We know there are very strongly held and polar opposite convictions regarding mandatory vaccination—because we have heard from many of you regarding your expectation that we advocate for your personal position on the issue. However, the reality is that AFA has a duty to fairly represent all Flight Attendants. Consequently, the MEC continues to represent the entire group by faithfully reporting to management:

  • This is a complex issue.
  • Some FAs are passionately opposed to mandatory vaccinations, disclosing vaccination status and disparate treatment of those who decline to disclose their vaccination status.
  • Some FAs are passionately demanding mandatory vaccinations and all efforts to move in that direction.
  • The entire group is experiencing a range of emotions regarding the announced policy changes.
  • Almost everyone seems to be disappointed with at least some aspect of the policy changes.
  • Several questions and concerns about how the new COVID-19 policies will be administered remain unresolved.

Unprofessional and/or Unsupportive Behavior, Disparate Treatment, Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment, and Harassment

The MEC has received concerns about unprofessional and/or unsupportive behavior, disparate treatment, discrimination, and hostile work environment. Regardless of the following legal minutiae, we understand that being at work lately has been more uncomfortable due to the divided opinions about vaccination and management’s recent COVID-19 policy changes.

Unprofessional and/or Unsupportive Behavior

On this point, we agree with Travis: “Our individual views around vaccinations do not warrant unprofessional or unsupportive behavior towards our fellow employees.” We need to find a way to peacefully coexist with each other, or there will eventually be disciplinary consequences. If you or your peers are struggling with experiences of unprofessional and/or unsupportive behavior between union-represented employees, then the MEC recommends contacting AFA EAP/Professional Standards for peer-to-peer handling.

Discrimination

There is a difference between ‘discrimination’ in the sense of (1) inequitable application of a Company rule and/or contract provision and/or disciplinary action versus (2) discrimination of a legally protected class. We will address the former later in the communication. Regarding the latter, our analysis is that the recent COVID-19 policy changes do not qualify as prohibited discrimination of a legally protected class. Even if there were such discrimination, AFA does not have the legal standing to bring forward such complaints under the law–the employee must do that directly.

Disparate Treatment and Hostile Work Environment

The recent vaccination policy changes by management are not technically disparate treatment or creating a hostile work environment under the law because disparate treatment or hostile work environment situations must occur in conjunction with illegal discrimination of a protected class to qualify.

Harassment

If you experience unprofessional or unsupportive behavior, then it is best practice to resolve those concerns directly with the employee(s) or via referral to Professional Standards for peer-to-peer handling. If any Flight Attendant is truly feeling harassed, we recommend bringing those concerns forward to Human Resources. AFA will make our best effort to provide a union representative for support during any conversations with Human Resources. Alternatively, or additionally, you may consider filing a complaint with the relevant government agencies or consulting with an attorney to discuss legal options. 

Inequitable and Unilateral Application of Non-Contractual Company Policy

AFA filed Grievance No. 36-99-2-230-21 Violation of §16 Sick Leave/On the Job Injury in response to management’s recent inequitable and unilateral application of a non-contractual (i.e., extra-contractual) Company Policy:

[AFA is] requesting an investigation and hearing into the following issue:

The Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §16 [Sick Leave/On the Job Injury], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it announced beginning on or about August 31, 2021, that it would grant pay protection per §21.M [Compensation: Pay Protection…] to vaccinated symptomatic and/or COVID+ Flight Attendants for scheduling obligations removed due to Company-directed quarantine in response to high-risk COVID-19 workplace exposures and deny pay protection under similar or the same circumstances for unvaccinated Flight Attendants or for Flight Attendants who decline to disclose their vaccination status and would instead require them to be removed from their scheduling obligations by forcing them onto sick leave and paid through their sick leave bank or accrued vacation pay if the sick leave bank was depleted. Neither §16 nor §21.M contains any exceptions or distinctions based on vaccination status, yet the Company failed to bargain with the Association and unilaterally implemented such non-contractual exceptions or distinctions inequitably across the collective bargaining unit.

Essentially, we are grieving the fact that management has no basis for applying the contract to some but not all Flight Attendants. Specifically, this is about Flight Attendants who decline to disclose vaccination status or have acknowledged they are not fully vaccinated and management’s denial of access to pay protection vs. sick leave for such FAs. This is because these FAs are inequitably and unilaterally denied pay protection for mandated quarantines under the COVID-19 contact tracing workplace exposure protocol and instead forced onto sick leave regardless of whether they are sick or not. Conversely, FAs who have confirmed they are fully vaccinated are afforded pay protection under the same or similar circumstances. This grievance was filed in response to management’s inequitable application of contractual sick leave provisions and benefits across the collective bargaining unit and not in response to any position about vaccination.

Remaining Questions and Concerns

The MEC recognizes that several details about the recent COVID-19 policy changes remain unclear and possibly may lead to AFA filing additional grievances. We have at least one follow-up meeting already scheduled between management and MEC representatives to discuss questions and concerns, so stay tuned for subsequent developments soon.

AFA Alaska Update – August 20, 2021

In This Edition

  • TSA Mask Mandate Extended Through January
  • Being Inclusive: A Reminder About Announcements
  • REMINDER: Help End Human Trafficking, Take the Survey

TSA Mask Mandate Extended Through January

Master Executive Council (MEC)

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has recently confirmed that it will extend its federal mask mandate on transportation until at least January 18, 2022. The mandate, which was previously scheduled to expire on September 13, was extended to “minimize the spread of COVID-19 on public transportation,” according to a TSA spokesperson.

AFA International President Sara Nelson released a statement on Wednesday in support of the extension of the mask mandate and said in part, “…the TSA enforcement directive for the CDC transportation mask mandate will help tremendously to keep passengers and aviation workers safe.”  The complete statement is available on the AFA International website.

AFA Alaska representatives from the Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC), Inflight Service Committee, and Master Executive Council (MEC) have been in communication with inflight management regarding the extension of the mask mandate.  Management has indicated that they do not anticipate any changes to mask/face covering policies at this time and current procedures will remain in effect for the new duration of the mandate.

Mask Mandate in the News

Being Inclusive: A Reminder About Announcements

Human Rights Committee

As Flight Attendants, we are used to certain routines and habitual behaviors when it comes to how we do our job.  The processes of performing the safety demo, setting up our galleys and carts for service, and many others are second nature to us, and we often don’t give them a second thought.  One of those deeply ingrained habits for many is starting our cabin announcements with the phrase “ladies and gentlemen”.

What you may not know, however, is that “ladies and gentlemen” is no longer part of our announcement scripts. Section 10 of the Flight Attendant Manual (FAM) and the announcements section of Block2Block no longer include any gender-specific references.  Though it may take some effort to drop the habit of using the phrase, doing so is important in creating an inclusive environment for all our fellow Flight Attendants, other co-workers, and passengers.

Our MEC adopted a resolution on gender equality in December 2020.  The resolution affirms the MEC’s support of the right to recognition, acceptance, and inclusion of people of all gender identities and expressions both in and out of the workplace.  As not everyone identifies as male or female, preceding cabin announcements with the term “ladies and gentlemen” does not support a welcoming atmosphere for everyone.  Let’s work together to create an inclusive environment by using language that is welcoming to all!

Questions?

If you have any questions, please contact your Local Human Rights Committee.

REMINDER: Help End Human Trafficking, Take the Survey

AFA International

AFA is partnering with United Against Slavery in a global effort to end the scourge of human trafficking. As Flight Attendants and aviation’s first responders, we are uniquely positioned to identify human traffickers and assist their victims.

Human trafficking is a billion-dollar business, but Flight Attendants can be 100,000 Eyes in the Skies to recognize and report it. We can be the ones to make the difference.

Historical efforts to gather and understand information to implement effective solutions for this crime have been a challenge and success seemed unattainable. Why? They have not involved collecting the knowledge that only those on the frontlines have.

Click here to take the survey >

AFA Alaska Update – August 6, 2021

In This Edition

  • PBS Subcommittee Member Interviews
  • Let’s Talk About Eating Disorders

PBS Subcommittee Member Interviews

Master Executive Council (MEC)

Background

The PBS Subcommittee, part of the MEC Scheduling Committee, works with the company and the Inflight Crew Planning Department to maintain the company’s preferential bidding system (PBS) and oversee the bidding and bid award processes.  The Subcommittee represents and advocates for the MEC position in matters pertaining to bidding and the preferential bidding system.

The PBS Subcommittee is currently made up of the MEC Scheduling Committee Vice Chairperson—PBS and two PBS Subcommittee Members.  The MEC is seeking to fill a third PBS Subcommittee Member position at this time. 

Qualifications

  • Robust working knowledge of hours of service, scheduling, and reserve provisions of the Flight Attendant collective bargaining agreement (CBA).
  • Knowledge of CFRs and other regulations pertaining to flight time, duty time, and crew rest guidelines.
  • Ability to work remotely and attend virtual meetings as required.
  • Strong computer skills. Excellent working knowledge of NAVBLUE PBS, Crew Access, Google email, and Microsoft Office.
  • Strong written and verbal communication skills. Ability to write membership communications, respond professionally to internal and external e-mail, analyze data, and prepare reports.
  • Ability to meet deadlines, take ownership of issues, and follow up on assigned tasks.

Duties

  • Regularly communicate with and provide updates to the MEC Scheduling Chairperson on the activities of the subcommittee
  • In advance of the bidding period each month, communicate with the MEC Scheduling Committee Vice Chairperson—Pairing Construction to understand changes in pairings for upcoming months and how Flight Attendant bids might be affected
  • Keep members knowledgeable about changes to the preferential bidding system, common mistakes and errors, misunderstandings about the system, and other topics of interest through the MEC Communications Chairperson
  • Provide assistance to Flight Attendants through base sits, one-on-one training sessions, and telephone support during the monthly bidding window and as requested by the MEC or LECs
  • Communicate with the MEC Reserve Chairperson to understand the needs and challenges of Flight Attendants holding reserve schedules and provide bid assistance

Time Commitment and Flight Pay Loss Reimbursement

  • This position is eligible for Company Business (CB) Flight Pay Loss (FPL), paid in accordance with section 27.P.1.e of the Flight Attendant CBA.  Time worked is logged on a monthly basis and paid at a rate of 0.75 TFP per hour with a 5% override at “A” pay.
  • Time commitment is approximately 30 to 40 hours per month.  Most of the workload is weighted heavily toward the first half of the calendar month during the bidding and bid awards processes.  These amounts can fluctuate.
  • Most work for this position can be performed remotely.

Term of Appointment

This position will serve for the remaining portion of the current MEC term of office, currently scheduled to end on December 31, 2022.

Working Relationships

With The Scheduling Committee

Occasional interaction with the Local Scheduling Committee Chairpersons and Local Scheduling Committee Members.

With The Master Executive Council

This position reports to the Master Executive Council through the MEC Scheduling Committee Vice Chairperson—PBS and MEC Scheduling Committee Chairperson.

With Alaska Airlines Management

Constant interaction with inflight management, particularly the Crew Planning Analysts (John Bumanglag and Kelly Yeager) and Manager of Crew Planning (Mac Patterson).

Expressing Interest and Interview Scheduling

The MEC will hold interviews during the September MEC meeting on Tuesday, September 14, 2021.  Bid around the interview date or plan to arrange your schedule accordingly to accommodate.  All interviews will be conducted by Google Meet videoconferencing.

Interested candidates should submit an expression of interest and resume online at https://forms.gle/syy62DpL96ESQazQA.  The deadline for submissions is 5 PM Pacific time on Tuesday, September 7.  After that time, qualified candidates will be contacted to schedule a specific interview time.

Please note that to submit an expression of interest, you must have a Google account.  If you do not have a Google account, you can create one for free at https://accounts.google.com/signup.

Questions?

Please direct any questions about the position to MEC Scheduling Committee Vice Chairperson—PBS Adam Clarey at adam.clarey@afaalaska.org.

Let’s Talk About Eating Disorders

Employee Assistance Program (EAP)/Professional Standards Committee

The way we talk about eating disorders matters. Here are some facts you can use to help shape a conversation around eating disorders with family members and friends. If you or a loved one is struggling with an eating disorder, remember that your AFA EAP is a confidential resource for support, referrals and access to treatment.

Eating disorders are medical illnesses.

Genetic and environmental factors can influence eating disorders. An eating disorder is not a trend or a choice.

Eating disorders are serious and can be fatal.

Eating disorders often involve serious medical complications that can cause permanent damage or death. People with eating disorders also have an increased risk of dying by suicide.

Eating disorders can affect anyone.

Eating disorders do not discriminate. They affect people of all ages, races and ethnicities, and genders.

You can’t tell if someone has an eating disorder by looking at them.

People with eating disorders can be underweight, normal weight, or overweight.

Family members can be a patient’s best ally in treatment.

Eating disorders are caused by a combination of genetic, biological, behavioral, psychological, and social factors. Family members do not cause eating disorders and can be great sources of support.

It is possible to recover from an eating disorder.

Complete recovery is possible with treatment and time.

Have Questions or Need Help?

Your Local EAP Committee contact information is available at afaalaska.org/eap or you can call (949) 470-0493.

COVID-19 Vaccination Attestation Concerns

COVID-19 Vaccination Attestation Concerns

Master Executive Council (MEC), Grievance Committee

Several members have reached out to AFA regarding management’s recent email titled, “Vaccination Attestation and Masking policy changes.”  Some of the questions being asked:  Can management ask about our vaccination status?  Is it a violation of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to ask about our vaccination status?  What is AFA doing about it?

Can Alaska Airlines (a private employer) ask about employees’ vaccination status?

In a nutshell, yes.  Given the contagiousness and deadliness of the COVID-19 virus and its more contagious Delta variant, companies have a legitimate business reason to inquire about an employee’s vaccination status.  An employer can ask employees about their vaccination status and/or for proof of vaccination provided it does not make medical inquiries that could prompt discussion about disability-related information, which would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 

Employers have a duty of care under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) to provide a safe workplace for employees.  Under this duty of care an employer can ask employees about their vaccination status and/or for proof of vaccination, subject to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidelines.  If an employee is unable or unwilling to disclose their vaccination status and/or to provide proof of vaccination, the employer is allowed to enforce workplace safety policies such as mask wearing and/or social distancing.  Management has the discretion to treat such employees the same way as employees who refuse to be vaccinated on non-medical or non-religious grounds.

Identifying employees who are exempt from mask requirements while in Company buildings with tags or stickers is not a discriminatory practice under EEOC guidelines.  Tags or stickers will not be actively distributed to crewmembers because mask requirement remain in place at airports and on aircraft, and there is no exemption to those requirements for crewmembers.

At this point, Alaska Airlines is not requiring proof of vaccination status, but AFA believes it would behoove one to answer honestly since it appears the Company has the legal right to request such proof. If you have concerns about disclosing your status, AFA recommends selecting the opt-out response: “I decline to answer.”

Is it a violation of HIPAA for an employer to ask employees about their vaccination status?

HIPAA applies to covered entities such as healthcare providers and the like.  HIPAA does not apply to most (non-healthcare) employers, so it is not a violation for Alaska Airlines to ask its employees about their vaccination status. HIPPA is designed to keep your medical information safe from being shared with third parties. In other words, management can ask you about your vaccination status, but cannot contact your doctor or healthcare provider to ask about your status. Even so, management will safeguard the records of employee attestations by sharing the information only with Human Resources and those deemed necessary to know in limited circumstances and by storing the data in a separate location from personnel records.

What is AFA doing about it?

Management’s requirement for employees to complete a vaccination attestation is not a contractual violation under our Collective Bargaining Agreement, nor does such requirement appear to be a violation of religious freedoms, civil liberties, or any other federal laws.  The “requirement” to complete the attestation is more like a strongly encouraged request because management has indicated to AFA that employees who do not fill out the form will not be disciplined at this time, so we do not anticipate any resulting disciplinary grievances. Finally, there is an opt-out response available for any who remain concerned about disclosing their vaccination status: “I decline to answer.”

AFA Alaska Update – July 30, 2021

In This Edition

  • Protect Our Contract – Don’t Perform Duties Belonging to Other Work Groups
  • Help End Human Trafficking: Take the Survey

Protect Our Contract – Don’t Perform Duties Belonging to Other Work Groups

Grievance Committee

Over the course of many decades, all of us have worked hard to improve our working conditions and strengthen our collective bargaining agreement (CBA).  These improvements have been achieved through several avenues including demonstrating our solidarity during contract negotiations, lobbying management to make changes that benefit our profession, and rigorously enforcing the contractual language that we have already achieved.  It is the responsibility of each of us to continue to protect and defend our contract and hold management accountable for what has been agreed upon by both our Flight Attendants and the Company.

Recently, management has made it known that they are having a particularly difficult time recruiting and retaining frontline employees in various locations throughout the route network.  This includes staff who are directly employed by the company, those who are employed by subsidiaries of the company (e.g., McGee Air Services), and contract vendors who provide above- and/or below-the-wing services at various stations.  The situation has caused a noticeable impact to the Company’s operations and has resulted in some on-the-ground functions being adjusted or modified due to staffing in some situations. 

We all know that Alaska Airlines focuses on hiring Flight Attendants who exhibit kindness and demonstrate a willingness to help. Because these traits are such a pervasive part of our culture, it may be tempting to want to jump in and assist our coworkers from other work groups when we see that they are short staffed.  Unfortunately, this causes more harm than good for several reasons. 

As previously mentioned, it is up to each of us to protect the provisions of our collective bargaining agreement.  Section 24.D of the CBA says in part: “A Flight Attendant will not be required to perform work normally assigned to a cleaner, provisioner, ramp or operations agent.”  Just as we expect other work groups to honor our contractual language by not performing Flight Attendant duties and responsibilities, it is similarly important that we respect other work groups and their normally assigned scope of work as well.  Doing so protects the security of both Flight Attendant jobs and the jobs of our coworkers in other departments.

Customer service, ramp, mechanics, pilots, fleet service, catering, and other work groups receive specific training to perform their duties that Flight Attendants do not have.  We must allow our colleagues to do the work that they have been trained to do to ensure that it is done in compliance with applicable regulations and to company standards.  If there are concerns with staffing in a particular department, management needs to receive the corresponding reports of flight delays, complaints from passengers, and performance audit results.  These are all indicators that management uses to adjust and ensure that our colleagues in other departments have the support that they need.  If this data is skewed to show that no problems exist, then no changes will made by management to ensure proper staffing and service levels.

The best way that Flight Attendants can show support for other work groups who might be experiencing short staffing is by reporting the issue to ensure that it gets attention from the right levels of management.  This can be accomplished by submitting a Flight Attendant Irregularity Report (FAIR) detailing the date, flight number, and specifics of the situation (e.g., areas that were skipped/missed, etc.).

Questions?

If you have any questions, please contact your Local Grievance Committee.

Help End Human Trafficking: Take the Survey

AFA International

AFA is partnering with United Against Slavery in a global effort to end the scourge of human trafficking. As Flight Attendants and aviation’s first responders, we are uniquely positioned to identify human traffickers and assist their victims.

Human trafficking is a billion-dollar business, but Flight Attendants can be 100,000 Eyes in the Skies to recognize and report it. We can be the ones to make the difference.

Historical efforts to gather and understand information to implement effective solutions for this crime have been a challenge and success seemed unattainable. Why? They have not involved collecting the knowledge that only those on the frontlines have.

Click here to take the survey >

Hawaiian Flight Attendant Seattle Domicile LOA Session #3 Roadshow Recording

The Seattle Domicile Letter of Agreement (SEA LOA) Presentation offers a comprehensive overview of the agreement with updates to the extended bidding timeline. The Question and Answer Post has also been updated to ensure that the latest information and additional inquiries are addressed.

Pre-Merger Alaska MEC Committee Chairperson Election Results

This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants During this week’s MEC Meeting, our MEC held interviews for the position of MEC Reserve Committee Vice Chairperson—New Hire & Probation. We want to thank everyone who expressed interest in the available positions and their willingness to serve. After careful consideration and deliberation, the following candidate has […]

SEA Domicile Negotiations Update – January 2026

The Hawaiian Seattle Domicile Negotiating Committee has reached an agreement with management, confirming the “Rescinding the Award” provision and extending the bid timeline by one week to Monday, January 19 at 2359 HT. As of January 7, a total of 189 Hawaiian Flight Attendants have submitted bids for the new SEA Domicile, primarily from HNL and LAX. Discussions about the moving day process are ongoing, with further updates expected before the revised bid deadline.

Recent Posts

News By Month

News By Category

AFA News Now Air Quality Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) AS/HA Merger AS/VX Merger Benefits Committee Committees Communications Committee Contract Contract 2014 Negotiations Blog Council 15 SAN Council 18 LAX (pmAS) Council 19 SEA Council 30 ANC Council 35 SFO Council 39 PDX Council 47 LAX (pmHA) EAP/Professional Standards Committee Extension 2021 Blog Featured Government Affairs Committee Grievance Committee Hotel Committee Human Rights & Equity Committee Industry News Inflight Service Committee Inflight Training Committee JNC Blog Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) Latest News Local Councils Master Executive Council (MEC) Membership Committee Membership Engagement Committee Message from the MEC President Mobilization Committee Negotiations Pairing Construction Preferential Bidding System (PBS) Press Releases Reserve Committee Retirement Committee Scheduling Committee Uniform Committee

Want To Stay In The Loop?

Stay up-to-date on AFA Alaska news and information by signing up for our email and text message updates. Click a button below to get started or update your preferences if you're already a subscriber.
Sign Up for Emails
Sign Up for Text Updates