AFA Alaska

Representing the Flight Attendants of Alaska + Hawaiian

Click here to report an issue to AFA
Menu
  • Local Councils
    • Anchorage (Council 30)
      • Officers
      • Committees
    • Honolulu (Council 43)
    • Los Angeles (Council 18/pmAS)
      • Officers
      • Committees
      • Los Angeles (Council 47/pmHA)
        • Officers
      • Portland (Council 39)
        • Officers
        • Committees
      • San Diego (Council 15)
        • Officers
        • Committees
        • Seattle (Council 19)
          • Officers
          • Committees
        • San Francisco (Council 35)
          • Officers
          • Committees

        • More About Local Councils >>
        Close
      • Master Executive Council
        • Officers
        • Close
      • Committees
          • Air Safety, Health, & Security (ASHSC)
            • Air Quality
          • Benefits
          • Communications
          • Employee Assistance Program & Professional Standards
          • Government Affairs
          • Grievance
          • Hotel
          • Human Rights & Equity
          • Inflight Service
          • Inflight Training
          • Membership
          • Membership Engagement
          • Reserve
          • Retirement
          • Scheduling
            • Pairing Construction
            • Preferential Bidding System (PBS)
          • Uniform

        • More About Committees >>
        Close
      • Contract
          • Contract Home
            • 2025 Alaska TA2 (Ratified)
            • 2018 Alaska JCBA
            • 2020 Hawaiian Contract
            • Ask Contract Questions
          • Contract Resources
          • Alaska Contract Negotiations (2022-2025)
        • Close
      • Resources
          • What To Do If You Encounter Contaminated Cabin Air
          • Issues & Campaigns
          • Newsroom
            • AFA News Now
          • Event Calendar
          • Membership Services
          • New Members
          • About
          • Links
          Close
        • Merger
          • Joint Negotiating Committee
          • Close
        • Contact Us
        You are here: Home / Archives for Committees / Grievance Committee

        Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies – Part 2

        October 5, 2021 17:00

        Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies – Part 2

        Master Executive Council (MEC) and Grievance Committee

        Click here for Part 1 >

        In This Update

        • Presidential Executive Order Vaccination Mandate

        Presidential Executive Order Vaccination Mandate

        Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air are government contractors and their employees subject to the related vaccination requirements under the Presidential Executive Order

        As you have almost certainly heard by now, Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air have determined that they are federal contractors and therefore their employees are subject to the vaccination requirements under the Presidential Executive Order. See the Company email to all employees “Important information about required vaccinations“ (September 30, 2021) for more information. Southwest, American, JetBlue and other airlines have likewise determined that the mandate applies to them.

        What does this mean for Air Group?

        First and foremost, vaccine mandates are legal and constitutional. The government has a compelling interest in public health, and the United States Supreme Court has upheld vaccination mandates in the past. Under the Executive Order (EO), all Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air employees will be required to be fully vaccinated or have an approved exemption on file as early as December 8, 2021 (unless this date subsequently gets pushed).

        Immunity from a prior COVID-19 infection is not sufficient under the mandate. To be considered fully vaccinated prior to that date, your last Pfizer or Moderna shot, or your single Johnson & Johnson shot, must be no later than November 24, 2021.  Regular testing under the EO is not considered an adequate substitute unless it is part of an accommodation for an approved exemption on file for substantiated medical reasons or a sincerely held religious belief.

        Medical / Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) exemptions

        If you are unable to receive any of the available vaccines for medical reasons, your employer must attempt to reasonably accommodate your disability.  An accommodation can involve making changes to your work environment to protect you and others, a long-term leave, or perhaps something in between, such as regular testing. The actual accommodation would depend both on the disability and the workplace and nature of the business. An employer is not required to make any particular accommodation you request, or to make an accommodation that would cause an undue hardship, which means great expense, inconvenience or disruption of the workplace. Alaska and Horizon management have not yet informed us how they intend to accommodate medical exemptions, or what medical evidence they will require to establish an exemption. Medical exemptions are rare, as most people can well-tolerate the COVID-19 vaccines.

        Sincerely held religious belief exemptions

        If an employee states that he or she has a sincerely held religious objection to vaccination, the employer must generally accept this as true—even if the religion (or other moral belief) is unfamiliar to the employer. However, employers are entitled to question and probe the belief, and may consider factors such as:

        • Whether the employee has behaved in a manner markedly inconsistent with the professed belief;
        • Whether the accommodation sought is a particularly desirable benefit that is likely to be sought for secular reasons; 
        • Whether the timing of the request renders it suspect (e.g., it follows an earlier request by the employee for the same benefit for secular reasons); and 
        • Whether the employer otherwise has reason to believe the accommodation is not sought for religious reasons.

        Proof of vaccination

        The vaccine mandate requires the Company to collect proof of vaccination from all employees who do not have a medical or religious exemption. You will not simply be able to attest that you have been vaccinated; you will be required to show one of the following:

        • A copy of the record of immunization from a health care provider or pharmacy;
        • A copy of the COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card;
        • A copy of medical records documenting the vaccination;
        • A copy of immunization records from a public health or state immunization information system; or
        • A copy of any other official documentation verifying vaccination with information on the vaccine name, date(s) of administration, and the name of health care professional or clinic site administering the vaccine.

        Data privacy and HIPAA

        This information is not protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), because employers such as Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air are not covered entities under HIPAA. According to the latest guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the employer does, however, have an obligation to safeguard this as confidential medical information under the ADA that must be stored separately from the employee’s personnel file.


        AFA leaders will be meeting with management soon to gain clarity on how the Executive Order will be administered. The bottom line is that the mandate does apply to us under federal law, and we cannot negotiate around it or grieve it.  AFA will continue to advocate on behalf of the entire membership and to fairly represent all Flight Attendants throughout these challenging times.

        Stay tuned for more updates.

        Filed Under: Grievance Committee, Latest News, Master Executive Council (MEC) Tagged With: 2021, COVID-19

        Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 3

        September 20, 2021 17:00

        Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 3

        Master Executive Council (MEC), Grievance Committee, Benefits Committee

        This is the third in a series reporting on management’s opposition to various state and local laws, the latest developments to complex state law litigations related to these laws that are playing out in Washington and California, and what Flight Attendants can do about it.

        Read Part 2 here >

        Read Part 1 here >

        In This Edition

        • WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)
        • CA 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

        WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)

        Management will unilaterally decline to initiate payroll deductions for flight crew in January 2022

        The Washington Cares Fund is the nation’s first state-administered long-term care insurance program. Benefits will be funded by a 0.58% employee-paid payroll tax beginning January 1, 2022. However, Alaska Airlines management has unilaterally taken the position that the WA Cares Fund does not apply to flight crew and therefore will not initiate payroll deductions this coming January. In an email titled “Important Information About Washington’s Long-Term Care Act” (July 8, 2021), management advised all WA-domiciled Alaska Airlines Flight Attendants that flight crew may still consider pursuing a permanent one-time opt-out of the Program and all associated taxes and benefits by obtaining private long-term care insurance prior to the deadline of November 1, 2021. Currently, there is no opt-out option for any employee who becomes domiciled in (i.e., employed in) Washington after the applicable deadlines.

        If management will not deduct flight crew contributions, then why bother opting out?

        Flight Attendants may eventually change jobs within the Company (i.e., transfer to another position that is not classified as flight crew) or work for other employers within Washington. Additionally, the Company’s position regarding flight crew is currently untested from a legal perspective. It is entirely possible that the courts may eventually require Alaska Airlines to withhold WA Cares Fund payroll contributions on behalf of flight crew.

        Grossly unfair to non-resident employees

        Although all WA-domiciled flight crew would otherwise theoretically be required to contribute to the fund (except for management’s unilateral position regarding flight crew and certain state and local laws), only Washington residents may utilize Care Fund benefits. This is grossly unfair to non-resident flight crew (i.e., out of state commuters). Consequently, AFA Alaska agrees with and supports ALPA Alaska in filing legal objections with Washington State regarding concerns that the WA Cares Fund violates the Dormant Commerce Clause, which is inferred from Article I of the US Constitution, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause, which is derived from Article IV, Section 2 of the US Constitution. Resolution under this path could take a very long time, so this is another reason that non-resident WA-domiciled flight crew might consider opting out if possible.

        Challenges with opting out

        Unfortunately, it is extremely challenging to opt out unless you started applying for private insurance many, many months ago—especially if you are younger. AFA is unaware of any private insurers who are currently offering new long-term care policies. Additionally, there is a significant administrative backlog of applications with all known private insurers, so it is very concerning—and unknown—whether all pending policies will be executed prior to the November 1st deadline.

        Will I be required to directly contribute to the WA Cares Fund or pay back contributions not made on my behalf?

        Quite simply, it is unclear but doubtful. Again, AFA Alaska agrees with and supports ALPA Alaska filing legal objections with Washington State regarding concerns that the WA Cares Fund raises due process problems insofar as the law does not specify who bears consequences for an employer’s failure to remit employee premiums or what those consequences would be. However, there is no mechanism for employees to make direct contributions to the WA Care Fund, and there is no provision in the law to recoup contributions not withheld and made by the employer.

        Interestingly, Alaska Airlines management personnel from the People Team (i.e., Human Resources) have advised individual Flight Attendants who have directly inquired with them that the Company would “likely” be required to pay back the contributions owed on behalf of flight crew if Washington State came back and said that flight crew are required to pay such contributions. This is presumably under a scenario in which the State of Washington prevailed in the courts pursuant to this almost-inevitable dispute. However, Alaska Airlines management has not responded to the Association’s inquiry to confirm such guidance prior to publication of this update.

        Estimated (theoretical) contributions

        $25k gross annual earnings = ~$12/month | $50k gross annual earnings = ~$24/month | $75k gross annual earnings = ~$36/month | $100k gross annual earnings = ~$48/month


        CA 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

        Up to 80 paid hours for certain COVID-19 related absences from a separate employer-paid sick bank

        One of the more notable temporary COVID-19 laws is California’s 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave. The law was effective as of March 29, 2021, was retroactive to January 1, 2021, and ends soon on September 30, 2021.  It states that California employees will be paid up to 80 hours by the employer rather than through the employee’s own sick leave bank for COVID-19 related quarantines, vaccination appointments and vaccine symptoms. Click here for FAQs. Thus far, management has denied all requests from Flight Attendants to comply with the law, e.g., to pay out of the separate COVID-19 sick bank.  

        Filing a claim

        Any CA-domiciled Flight Attendant who has used Sick Leave for COVID-19 related absences between January 1st and September 30th should file a claim or a report of a labor law violation with the Labor Commissioner’s Office, which is the state agency charged with enforcement. Please file a claim as soon as possible, but our understanding is that the state accepts such claims for up to three years. Flight Attendants also always have the option to hire their own attorney at their own expense if so desired.

        AFA Alaska representatives are here to help

        Although AFA cannot represent any FAs regarding such claims, we would very much appreciate you keeping us posted on any developments. Outside counsel has already responded to some claims with very official-looking but in our opinion not entirely on point legalese. AFA Alaska representatives are more than willing to help by supplying basic information and tips, and we would cooperate with any requests from claim investigators. Do not let management’s legal tactics put you off from pressing forward with your rightful claim!

        Filed Under: Benefits Committee, Grievance Committee, Latest News, Master Executive Council (MEC) Tagged With: 2021, state laws

        AFA Alaska Update – September 17, 2021

        September 17, 2021 12:00

        In This Edition

        • Celebrating Hispanic-Latinx Heritage Month
        • PBS Subcommittee Appointment
        • Why a $5 Starbucks Card is Important to Your Contractual Rights

        Celebrating Hispanic-Latinx Heritage Month

        Human Rights Committee

        September 15 marks the first day of Hispanic-Latinx Heritage Month in the United States.  The celebration, which is also referred to as National Hispanic Heritage Month, began as Hispanic Heritage week when it was established by legislation that was signed into law by President Lydon Johnson in 1968.  In 1988, the single week event was expanded to a month-long period to be celebrated each year from September 15 to October 15.

        September 15 is of significance as it marks the anniversary of independence of the Latin American countries of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua.  Mexico also celebrates independence on September 16, Chile on September 18, and Belize on September 21. 

        Learn More About Hispanic-Latinx History

        You can learn more about the accomplishments of Hispanic-Latinx Americans through some of the dedicated websites and resources below.

        • Library of Congress – National Hispanic Heritage Month
        • National Archives – Hispanic Heritage Month
        • National Park Service – Hispanic Heritage Month
        • Smithsonian Institution – Latino Center
        • Alaska Air Group Latin Culture Resource Group (LCRG) – Celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month (AAG sign-on required)

        Hispanic-Latinx Heritage Month AFA Pins Coming in 2022

        The AFA Executive Board recently passed a resolution recognizing Hispanic-Latinx Heritage Month and providing for the creation of a new diversity AFA pin in celebration.  You can read the complete text of the resolution by clicking here.  The new pin will be undergo the design and development process over the next year and will be made available in September 2022.

        Questions?

        If you have any questions, please contact your Local Human Rights Committee.


        PBS Subcommittee Appointment

        Master Executive Council (MEC)

        Our Master Executive Council (MEC) conducted interviews this week for an additional PBS Subcommittee Member as previously announced in the August 6 AFA Update email.  The MEC would like to thank the candidates who demonstrated willingness to represent our Flight Attendants. After thorough consideration, the MEC has appointed SAN-based Flight Attendant Steven Patronsky to the position.

        About Steve

        Representing the membership and upholding contract compliance are the aspects of the work that most excites Steve about being appointed to the PBS Subcommittee. His volunteering history for AFA includes work on the Scheduling and Hotel Committees.  Steve’s recent accomplishments include completing a Master’s Program at the University of Central Florida and remodeling a 50’s era Mid-Century home in Orlando. 

        About the Position

        The PBS Subcommittee, part of the Scheduling Committee, works with the company and the Inflight Crew Planning Department to maintain the company’s preferential bidding system and oversee the bidding and bid award processes.  The Subcommittee represents and advocates for the MEC position in matters pertaining to bidding and the preferential bidding system.  Additional information about the position and subcommittee can be found by clicking here.


        Why a $5 Starbucks Card is Important to Your Contractual Rights

        Grievance Committee

        In early 2020, our Grievance Committee included information in an AFA Update about a settlement agreement related to management issuing $5 Starbucks cards to ANC-based Flight Attendants for meeting an attendance goal back in 2015.  You can read the original communication from March 25, 2020 by clicking here (scroll to the Grievance Committee Update article, then the Recent Settled Grievances heading).  Due to the pandemic and other administrative issues, management is just now distributing the Starbucks card as agreed upon.

        So Why Is This Important?

        The issue at hand isn’t so much about the amount of the Starbucks card but rather what management did wrong.  The priority of our Grievance Committee is to ensure that management complies with our collective bargaining agreement (CBA).  In this case, management violated the CBA by awarding gift cards to a particular group of Flight Attendants for having better attendance rates than others without negotiating it with AFA.  Gift cards, which have a dollar value, are considered a form of compensation which is a negotiated part of our CBA.

        If our Grievance Committee had failed to address this contractual violation, regardless of how small it may seem, it could open the door to management making other attempts to change our compensation or working conditions in violation of the CBA.  This settlement agreement protects your rights and makes all Flight Attendants equal in terms of the CBA.  Although it may only be $5 to each Flight Attendant, the overall cost to management for the settlement agreement is significant and a reminder not to violate the language in our contract.

        Questions?

        If you have questions about the settlement agreement or reasoning behind it, please feel free to reach out to your Local Grievance Committee.

        Filed Under: Grievance Committee, Human Rights & Equity Committee, Preferential Bidding System (PBS), Scheduling Committee Tagged With: 2021, committee appointments, grievance settlement, Hispanic-Latinx Heritage Month, PBS

        Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 2

        September 16, 2021 17:00

        Management vs. State and Local Laws – Part 2

        Master Executive Council (MEC), Grievance Committee, Benefits Committee

        This is the second in a series reporting on management’s opposition to various state and local laws, the latest developments to complex state law litigations related to these laws that are playing out in Washington and California, and what Flight Attendants can do about it.

        Read Part 1 here >

        In This Edition

        • Definition of Sick Family/Sick Child
        • Applicable State Laws
        • Filing a Claim with the Appropriate Agency

        Most Liberal of the Flight Attendant Domicile State Laws Definition of “Sick Family/Sick Child”

        The Roberts Decision and LOA 5 Sick Family/Sick Child

        AFA arbitrated Grievance No. 36-99-02-49-03 “Family Leave Benefits” in 2005, which resulted in a favorable ruling for AFA by now-deceased Arbitrator Thomas Roberts. This award, which is usually referenced as “The Roberts Decision” by AFA and management, was at least in part subsequently incorporated into the current contract via Letter of Agreement 5 “Sick Family/Sick Child”:

        [W]henever the collective-bargaining agreement refers to a sick child, it is understood that this is a placeholder for “family member.” With the Association’s agreement, the Company will apply the most liberal of the laws of the states in which Flight Attendants are domiciled in determining the appropriate definition of “family member.” When this definition is determined, including any subsequent amendments pursuant to changes in the law or in the interpretation of the law, the Company will publish the definition and distribute it to the Flight Attendants.

        Through arbitration and bargaining, the Company is required to apply the most liberal of the Flight Attendant domicile state laws definition of “family member” for whom a Flight Attendant may utilize sick leave to care for that individual, under what circumstances and whether Flight Attendants will receive points under the Attendance Policy for such absences.

        Updated list of qualified family members for Sick Family/Sick Child (as of August 30, 2021)

        “Family member” includes: • Spouse • Registered domestic partner • Child (biological, step, adopted, foster, legal ward, or registered domestic partner’s child) of any age • Parent (biological, adoptive, step, foster, parent-in-law, or registered domestic partner’s parent) • Legal guardian of the F/A, spouse, or registered domestic partner as a minor • Individual with whom the F/A has or had an in loco parentis relationship – persons in loco parentis are those with day-to-day responsibilities to care for or financially support a child, or who had such responsibility for the employee when the employee was a child • Grandparent • Grandchild • Sibling

        Points for Sick Family/Sick Child (in dispute)

        Generally, no points apply for time off to care for the above individuals unless the Flight Attendant does not have enough sick leave to cover the absence. See Bulletin #2021-0059 for more information about the Company’s application in these circumstances. Please note this application remains in dispute via ongoing litigation.


        Applicable State Laws

        Summary

        ✅ = Honored | ⚠ = Partially honored and/or in dispute | 🚫 = Denied

        State laws that AFA believes should apply to flight crew include but are not limited to:

        • Washington
          • WA Family Care Act (WFCA) – 🚫
          • WA Paid Sick Leave (WPSL) – 🚫
          • WA Paid Family Leave (WPFL) – 🚫
          • WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund) – 🚫
        • Oregon
          • OR Family Leave Act (OFLA) – 🚫
          • OR Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance (PFMLI) – N/A
        • California
          • CA State Disability Insurance (CASDI) – ✅
          • CA Family Rights Act (CFRA) – 🚫
          • CA Family School Partnership Act – 🚫
        • All
          • Wage statement laws: AK, WA, OR – ✅; CA = ⚠
          • Supplemental/temporary COVID-19 leave laws – 🚫

        Washington

        WA Family Care Act (WFCA)

        • Reference:  RCW 49.12
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs:  Use of accrued vacation pay to care for qualified family members under certain conditions.
        • Status:  State of WA & AFA won lawsuit in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals; however, the Company continues to appeal at state level.
        • AS Compliance: No
        • Contact Information:  Washington State Department of Labor and Industries | Mailing Address: PO Box 44000 Olympia, WA  98504-4000 | Phone:  360-902-5800 | Website:  www.lni.wa.gov –> For Workers –> File a Workplace Complaint

        WA Paid Sick Leave (WPSL)

        • Reference:  Initiative 1433
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: (1) Employees can use sick leave for preventative care for themselves and/or applicable family members. (2) Discipline and infractions that may lead to discipline (including Attendance Points) cannot be assessed for use of paid SL. (3) Employees can use paid SL on the 90th calendar day of employment (i.e., during FA probationary period).
        • Status:  A4A is appealing summary judgment motion in favor of State of WA & AFA.  The State of WA won in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals; however, the Company continues to appeal.
        • AS Compliance: No
        • Contact Information: Washington State Department of Labor and Industries | Mailing Address: PO Box 44000 Olympia, WA  98504-4000 | Phone:  360-902-5800 | Website:  www.lni.wa.gov –> For Workers –> File a Workplace Complaint

        WA Paid Family Leave (WPFL)

        • Reference: Builds on FMLA & RCW 50A
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: WPFL is a statewide insurance program that ensures paid family leave for various situations. WPFL usually covers 12 weeks of leave, or up to 18 weeks in certain circumstances, and workers receive between $100 and $1,000 per week depending on their income.
        • Status:  No known disputes currently. – Premiums were to be deducted starting January 1, 2019, and leaves were to be allowed beginning January 1, 2020. 
        • AS Compliance: No
        • Contact Information:  Employment Security Department | Phone:  1-833-717-2273 | Email:  paidleave@esd.wa.gov | Website:paidleave.wa.gov

        WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)

        • Reference:  RCW 50B.04
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs:  The WA Cares Fund was created to reduce pressure on the Medicaid system. Once vested, you will be eligible to access a maximum lifetime benefit of $36,500 (adjusted for inflation) to pay for expenses associated with needing assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Unlike private insurance that generally requires you to be unable to do two ADLs, the WA Cares Fund requires that individuals need assistance with three ADLs to qualify. Examples of ADLs: Dressing, bathing, cognitive impairment, and other basic functions of your daily routine. Benefits are not portable or payable if you reside outside of Washington state at the time the benefit is needed.
        • Status:  No known disputes currently. – Paid for by a 0.58% tax on employee wages starting January 1, 2022, with benefits beginning in January 2025.
        • AS Compliance:  No – The Company does not intend to collect premiums.
        • Contact Information:  Washington State Department of Social and Health Services | Email:  wacaresfund@dshs.wa.gov | Website: http://www.wacaresfund.wa.gov/

        Oregon

        OR Family Leave Act (OFLA)

        • Reference:  https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors659a.html
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: OFLA provides up to a total of 12 weeks protected family leave per year, which runs concurrent with FMLA. An employee must be allowed to use any existing accrued paid leave, including sick leave, vacation leave, or any paid leave offered in lieu of vacation leave. To be eligible, you must have worked an average of 25 hours per week for 180 days.
        • Status:  No known disputes currently
        • AS Compliance:  No
        • Contact Information:  Bureau of Labor & Industries |Mailing Address: 800 NE Oregon St., Suite 1045 Portland, OR 97232 | Phone:  971-673-0761 | Email:  help@boli.state.or.us | Website:  https://www.oregon.gov/boli/workers/pages/oregon-family-leave.aspx | To file complaint:  https://www.oregon.gov/boli/workers/Pages/complaint.aspx

        OR Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance (OPFMLI)

        • Reference:  HB 2005​
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: OPFMLI will provide 12 weeks of paid time off for various circumstances, with weekly benefits capped at $1215. The employee must have earned at least $1,000 in wages during the previous year. This leave will run concurrent with OFLA. 
        • Status: State pushing start date to January 2023 or later
        • AS Compliance:  N/A – Begins in 2023 or later, but AS will likely not follow the law.
        • Contact Information:  Oregon Employment Department | Mailing Address:  875 Union St. NE Salem, OR 97311 | Phone: 503-947-1394 | Email:  paidfamilyandmedicalleave@oregon.gov | Website: https://www.oregon.gov/employ/PFMLI/Pages/default.aspx

        California

        CA State Disability Insurance (CASDI)

        • Reference:  California Unemployment Insurance Code §2601 et seq.
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs:  Partial wage replacement for non-work disability: illness, injury and/or pregnancy. SDI contributions are paid by California workers covered by the SDI program.
        • Status:  No known disputes currently
        • AS Compliance:  Yes – Since 1987
        • Contact Information:  Employment Development Department | Phone numbers:  English: 1-800-480-3287; and Spanish: 1-866-658-8846 | Website:  https://askedd.edd.ca.gov or https://edd.ca.gov/Disability/SDI_Online.htm

        CA Family Rights Act (CFRA)

        • Reference:
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: CFRA includes a generous pregnancy disability leave (PDL) and other family care and medical leave provisions under The Fair Employment and Housing Act. Requires 1250 hours in the prior 12 months. CFRA is like FMLA, but CFRA also covers domestic partner and domestic partner’s children. An employer can require the employee to use vacation pay, but the employee cannot use sick leave if not for the employee’s own medical condition. Health benefits must be continued during the leave if the employer is part of a group plan.
        • Status:  No lawsuits known to AFA at this time.
        • AS Compliance:  No
        • Contact Information:  Department of Fair Employment and Housing | Mailing Address: 2218 Kausen Drive, Suite 100, Elk Grove, CA 95758 | Phone: (800) 884-1684 | Email:  contact.center@dfeh.ca.gov | Website:  http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/

        CA Family School Partnership Act

        • Reference:  CA Labor Code 230.8
        • Rule(s) of Interest to FAs: Employees may take 8 hours/month up to 40 hours/year to attend any day care or K-12 school function that is sponsored, supervised, or approved by the school, school board, or childcare facility. Time loss may be paid out of vacation pay, compensatory time off (CTO), personal time off or unpaid. Attendance Points may not be assessed for using this leave. Applies to parents, grandparents, or guardians with at least seven days’ notice.
        • Status:  No known disputes currently. – AFA encourages eligible and willing California FAs to request time off under this law and then to file a complaint with the state when denied.
        • AS Compliance:  No
        • Contact Information:  CA Dept of Industrial Relations | Phone Numbers: 1-844-619-8786 or SFO 415-703-5300, LAX 213-620-6330 or SAN 619-220-5451 | Email:  DLSE2@Dir.CA.gov | Website:  https://www.dfeh.ca.gov –> Complaints

        Filing a Claim with the Appropriate Agency

        AFA cannot file claims on behalf of Flight Attendants, but we’re here to assist

        AFA does not have the ‘standing’ to file complaints with state or local agencies on behalf of affected employees–even if those employees are AFA Alaska members. However, we are very much interested in guiding and supporting members to file such complaints. Flight Attendants should reach out to their local AFA Benefits Committee representatives to discuss the law in question, and we will refer you to the applicable state agency so you can file a claim. Flight Attendants should copy an AFA rep into any email correspondence with the state.

        Helpful tips

        When filing a claim, the Flight Attendant will need to provide evidence of the Company’s refusal to comply with the law. Flight Attendants are encouraged to keep a documentation trail and to file timely as there may be filing timelines. We encourage Flight Attendants to tell any state agency representative that Alaska Airlines is knowingly disregarding the law.  AFA is hopeful that the states will act against Alaska Airlines management directly and compel the Company to comply with applicable state laws.   


        In the Next Edition (Publishing Monday)

        • WA Long Term Care (Cares Fund)
        • CA 2021 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave

        Filed Under: Benefits Committee, Grievance Committee, Latest News, Master Executive Council (MEC) Tagged With: 2021, state laws

        Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies

        September 3, 2021 11:00

        Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies

        Master Executive Council (MEC) and Grievance Committee


        Summary of Recent Changes to COVID-19 Policies

        The following is a general summary of what Alaska Airlines management announced in the “Our plan for keeping you and our guests safe from COVID” email that was sent earlier yesterday to all employees regarding the Company’s approach to vaccination and COVID safety measures:

        • No requirement for existing employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19
        • Requirement for new hire employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 -> This was previously communicated via an August 30th email from VP Inflight Travis Gelbrich “Important updates to pay protection and new hire policies,” which also references exceptions for accommodations required by law for medical exemptions or sincerely held religious beliefs
        • $200 incentive if proof of vaccination is submitted byOctober 15, 2021
        • Pay protection for vaccinated employees during any Company-mandated quarantine period for workplace exposure (for Flight Attendants: as defined by the Inflight division’s contact tracing protocol) -> Already communicated earlier in the week via the email from Travis
        • No pay protection for employees who decline to confirm being fully vaccinated for all COVID-related absences including during any Company-mandated quarantine period for workplace exposure (for FAs: as defined by the Inflight division’s contact tracing protocol) -> Already communicated earlier in the week via the email from Travis and confirmed by the updated contact tracing protocol effective September 2, 2021
        • For employees who decline to submit proof of vaccination by November 1st:
          • Regular COVD-19 testing
          • Must always wear a mask regardless of federal, state, and local requirements
          • Mandatory vaccine education program and acknowledgement of the risks of remaining unvaccinated and the protocols to be followed

        Duty of Fair Representation

        We know there are very strongly held and polar opposite convictions regarding mandatory vaccination—because we have heard from many of you regarding your expectation that we advocate for your personal position on the issue. However, the reality is that AFA has a duty to fairly represent all Flight Attendants. Consequently, the MEC continues to represent the entire group by faithfully reporting to management:

        • This is a complex issue.
        • Some FAs are passionately opposed to mandatory vaccinations, disclosing vaccination status and disparate treatment of those who decline to disclose their vaccination status.
        • Some FAs are passionately demanding mandatory vaccinations and all efforts to move in that direction.
        • The entire group is experiencing a range of emotions regarding the announced policy changes.
        • Almost everyone seems to be disappointed with at least some aspect of the policy changes.
        • Several questions and concerns about how the new COVID-19 policies will be administered remain unresolved.

        Unprofessional and/or Unsupportive Behavior, Disparate Treatment, Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment, and Harassment

        The MEC has received concerns about unprofessional and/or unsupportive behavior, disparate treatment, discrimination, and hostile work environment. Regardless of the following legal minutiae, we understand that being at work lately has been more uncomfortable due to the divided opinions about vaccination and management’s recent COVID-19 policy changes.

        Unprofessional and/or Unsupportive Behavior

        On this point, we agree with Travis: “Our individual views around vaccinations do not warrant unprofessional or unsupportive behavior towards our fellow employees.” We need to find a way to peacefully coexist with each other, or there will eventually be disciplinary consequences. If you or your peers are struggling with experiences of unprofessional and/or unsupportive behavior between union-represented employees, then the MEC recommends contacting AFA EAP/Professional Standards for peer-to-peer handling.

        Discrimination

        There is a difference between ‘discrimination’ in the sense of (1) inequitable application of a Company rule and/or contract provision and/or disciplinary action versus (2) discrimination of a legally protected class. We will address the former later in the communication. Regarding the latter, our analysis is that the recent COVID-19 policy changes do not qualify as prohibited discrimination of a legally protected class. Even if there were such discrimination, AFA does not have the legal standing to bring forward such complaints under the law–the employee must do that directly.

        Disparate Treatment and Hostile Work Environment

        The recent vaccination policy changes by management are not technically disparate treatment or creating a hostile work environment under the law because disparate treatment or hostile work environment situations must occur in conjunction with illegal discrimination of a protected class to qualify.

        Harassment

        If you experience unprofessional or unsupportive behavior, then it is best practice to resolve those concerns directly with the employee(s) or via referral to Professional Standards for peer-to-peer handling. If any Flight Attendant is truly feeling harassed, we recommend bringing those concerns forward to Human Resources. AFA will make our best effort to provide a union representative for support during any conversations with Human Resources. Alternatively, or additionally, you may consider filing a complaint with the relevant government agencies or consulting with an attorney to discuss legal options. 


        Inequitable and Unilateral Application of Non-Contractual Company Policy

        AFA filed Grievance No. 36-99-2-230-21 Violation of §16 Sick Leave/On the Job Injury in response to management’s recent inequitable and unilateral application of a non-contractual (i.e., extra-contractual) Company Policy:

        [AFA is] requesting an investigation and hearing into the following issue:

        The Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §16 [Sick Leave/On the Job Injury], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it announced beginning on or about August 31, 2021, that it would grant pay protection per §21.M [Compensation: Pay Protection…] to vaccinated symptomatic and/or COVID+ Flight Attendants for scheduling obligations removed due to Company-directed quarantine in response to high-risk COVID-19 workplace exposures and deny pay protection under similar or the same circumstances for unvaccinated Flight Attendants or for Flight Attendants who decline to disclose their vaccination status and would instead require them to be removed from their scheduling obligations by forcing them onto sick leave and paid through their sick leave bank or accrued vacation pay if the sick leave bank was depleted. Neither §16 nor §21.M contains any exceptions or distinctions based on vaccination status, yet the Company failed to bargain with the Association and unilaterally implemented such non-contractual exceptions or distinctions inequitably across the collective bargaining unit.

        Essentially, we are grieving the fact that management has no basis for applying the contract to some but not all Flight Attendants. Specifically, this is about Flight Attendants who decline to disclose vaccination status or have acknowledged they are not fully vaccinated and management’s denial of access to pay protection vs. sick leave for such FAs. This is because these FAs are inequitably and unilaterally denied pay protection for mandated quarantines under the COVID-19 contact tracing workplace exposure protocol and instead forced onto sick leave regardless of whether they are sick or not. Conversely, FAs who have confirmed they are fully vaccinated are afforded pay protection under the same or similar circumstances. This grievance was filed in response to management’s inequitable application of contractual sick leave provisions and benefits across the collective bargaining unit and not in response to any position about vaccination.


        Remaining Questions and Concerns

        The MEC recognizes that several details about the recent COVID-19 policy changes remain unclear and possibly may lead to AFA filing additional grievances. We have at least one follow-up meeting already scheduled between management and MEC representatives to discuss questions and concerns, so stay tuned for subsequent developments soon.

        Filed Under: Grievance Committee, Latest News, Master Executive Council (MEC) Tagged With: 2021, COVID-19, grievance, vaccination

        • « Previous Page
        • 1
        • …
        • 6
        • 7
        • 8
        • 9
        • 10
        • …
        • 24
        • Next Page »

        Need Help?

        Have an issue or concern to report to AFA?  Click here to access the AFA Alaska online support center.

        Latest News

        • We Will Never Forget – September 11, 2001
        • Vacation Survey Now Open
        • SEA Domicile Negotiations – September 2025
        • AFA News in Review – September 5, 2025
        • Pre-Merger Alaska MEC Committee Interviews—October 2025
        • Merged MEC Committee Chairperson Interviews—October 2025
        • Council 39 September 2025 Update 
        • AFA News in Review – August 29, 2025
        • Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – August 2025
        • AFA News in Review – August 22, 2025

        We Will Never Forget – September 11, 2001

        September 11, 2025

        AFA Never Forget Website United Flight 175 Robert J. FangmanAmy N. JarretAmy R. KingKathryn LaBorieAlfred G. MarchandMichael C. TarrouAlicia N. TitusCaptain: Victor SaraciniFirst Officer: Michael HorrocksCustomer Service Representatives: Marianne MacFarlane and Jesus Sanchez United Flight 93 Lorraine G. BaySandra BradshawWanda A. GreenCeeCee LylesDeborah WelshCaptain: Jason DahlFirst Officer: Leroy Homer American Flight 11 Barbara AresteguiJeffrey CollmanSara […]

        Vacation Survey Now Open

        September 10, 2025

        This message is for both pre-merger Alaska and Hawaiian Flight Attendants Your Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) is working diligently to understand and improve the vacation benefits for our Flight Attendants at Alaska and Hawaiian. Your input is essential in ensuring that the vacation provisions we adopt reflect your needs and preferences. To gather your perspectives, […]

        SEA Domicile Negotiations – September 2025

        September 6, 2025

        This message is for pre-merger Hawaiian Flight Attendants Negotiations Update The SEA Domicile Negotiating Committee met this week for three days of collective bargaining with management.  The SEA NC met with management on September 3 to September 5 in Honolulu. At the negotiating table for this session were: Representing AFA and our Flight Attendants   […]

        Pre-Merger Alaska MEC Committee Interviews—October 2025

        September 5, 2025

        This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants In accordance with Article VI.C of the AFA Alaska MEC Policy and Procedure Manual, the terms of office for the MEC Committee Chairpersons and other MEC-level positions align with those of the MEC Officers. Since the current term for the MEC Officers will conclude on December 31, […]

        Merged MEC Committee Chairperson Interviews—October 2025

        September 5, 2025

        This message is for both pre-merger Alaska and Hawaiian Flight Attendants The integration of our Master Executive Councils (MECs) is progressing steadily. Our first group of committees successfully merged on June 1, and we are now planning for another group of committees to merge on November 1. As part of the committee merging process, our […]

        Recent Posts

        • We Will Never Forget – September 11, 2001
        • Vacation Survey Now Open
        • SEA Domicile Negotiations – September 2025
        • AFA News in Review – September 5, 2025
        • Pre-Merger Alaska MEC Committee Interviews—October 2025
        • Merged MEC Committee Chairperson Interviews—October 2025
        • Council 39 September 2025 Update 
        • AFA News in Review – August 29, 2025
        • Scheduling Committee Meeting Recap – August 2025
        • AFA News in Review – August 22, 2025
        • Uniform Committee Meeting Recap – 3rd Quarter 2025
        • Hawaiian Airlines SEA Flight Attendant Domicile Update – August 2025
        • Seniority Merger Integration Committee Update – August 2025
        • AFA News in Review – August 15, 2025
        • Hotel Committee Meeting Recap – August 2025

        Local Councils

        • Anchorage
        • Honolulu
        • Los Angeles (pre-merger Alaska)
        • Los Angeles (pre-merger Hawaiian)
        • Portland
        • San Diego
        • San Francisco
        • Seattle

        Master Executive Council

        • MEC

        Negotiations

        • Contract 2022 Home
        • Negotiations News
        • TA2 Information

        Contract

        • Contract Home

        Committees

        • Air Safety, Health, & Security
        • Benefits
        • Communications
        • EAP/Professional Standards
        • Government Affairs
        • Grievance
        • Hotel
        • Human Rights
        • Inflight Service
        • Mobilization
        • Reserve
        • Retirement
        • Scheduling
        • Uniform

        News By Month

        News By Category

        AFA News Now Air Quality Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) AS/HA Merger AS/VX Merger Benefits Committee Committees Communications Committee Contract Contract 2014 Negotiations Blog Council 15 SAN Council 18 LAX Council 19 SEA Council 30 ANC Council 35 SFO Council 39 PDX EAP/Professional Standards Committee Extension 2021 Blog Featured Government Affairs Committee Grievance Committee Hotel Committee Human Rights & Equity Committee Industry News Inflight Service Committee Inflight Training Committee JNC Blog Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) Latest News Local Councils Master Executive Council (MEC) Membership Committee Message from the MEC President Mobilization Committee Negotiations Pairing Construction Preferential Bidding System (PBS) Press Releases Reserve Committee Retirement Committee Scheduling Committee Uniform Committee
        • Email
        • Facebook
        • Instagram
        • YouTube

        Want To Stay In The Loop?

        Stay up-to-date on AFA Alaska news and information by signing up for our email and text message updates. Click a button below to get started or update your preferences if you're already a subscriber.
        Sign Up for Emails
        Sign Up for Text Updates

        Connect With AFA

        • Contact Us
        • Online Support Center
        • AFA International
        • CWA
        • AFA Alaska Social Media Guidelines
        • AFA-CWA Mutual Respect Policy

        Copyright © 2013-2025 Alaska Airlines Master Executive Council, Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO