AFA Alaska + Hawaiian

Representing the Flight Attendants of Alaska + Hawaiian

Click here to report an issue to AFA
You are here: Home / Archives for Latest News / AFA News Now

Uniform Committee Meeting Recap – 2nd Quarter 2026

This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants

On Tuesday, May 5, our pre-merger Alaska AFA Uniform Committee Chairpersons met to discuss their ongoing work to represent Flight Attendants and push for improvements in the workplace. Representing you at the meeting were Kim Mazzolini (ANC), Dena Heath (SEA), Bob Moore (PDX), Slater Areno (SFO), Heather Holmes (LAX), and JP Perina (SAN). MEC Uniform Committee Chairperson David Jelinek was also present.

The committee also met with SFO Inflight Base Manager Cierra Lewis, SEA Fit Center Supervisor Ashley Sentner, Senior Director of Sourcing & Procurement Christine Wakayama, Alaska Principal Product Manager of Service Strategy Megan Low, and Brand Partnerships & Uniform Manager Janelle Bayne.

The next Quarterly Uniform Committee Meeting will be held on Thursday, August 13.

Topics of Discussion 

The committee reviewed several topics both during internal AFA-only conversation and when meeting with management. Some items discussed include:

  • Discounted Hosiery on Zappos: Unfortunately, management’s contact at Zappos is no longer working there. They are trying to find a new contact. More to come.
  • Compression Socks and Tights: Two companies that provide compression tights and socks (Discount Surgical and Compression Sale) have been added to the Perkspot website. For links to these companies and to see their product lines, check out Perkspot on Team AAG (Team AAG > HR/Pay/Total Rewards > Perks & Discounts > Employee Discounts – Perkspot).  
  • Patriotic Tie: is now permitted to be worn when working an Honor Flight. The uniform policy guide will be updated soon. 
  • Uniform Quality Concerns:
    • The Committee raised concerns about how the fabric quality appears to have changed between pieces purchased at the uniform launch and those purchased in the last year or two. The fabric content is the same, yet they feel different, and the sizes run differently.  
    • Management has collected samples and is comparing those to pieces in the fit center. At this point, there will be no changes in manufacturing; however, they are trying to pinpoint the cause of the discrepancy. 
  • Uniform Compliance Checks:
    • We are all aware of the ongoing uniform compliance checks. Management is focused on increasing compliance with the existing uniform policy among Flight Attendants in preparation for the upcoming new uniform launch. The Committee does not want any Flight Attendants to be issued Records of Discussion (RODs) or any other steps of discipline.
    • If you are flying with a Uniform Committee Member, feel free to ask questions.  If we see something that is not compliant and point it out, we are only trying to help you avoid a ROD. Feedback from a Uniform Committee Member is meant to help you avoid having a potentially negative interaction with a supervisor.
    • The Committee believes there are some vague policies that lead to Flight Attendants’ own interpretation and conflicting responses from management. Prime examples are nails and hair. The Committee asked for a visual reference for nails and hair. Management states that one was published in a monthly newsletter a while back, and that examples are included in the uniform policy guide.
    • Management states they have tried various approaches to get the workgroup on board with compliance standards, yet continue to see the same violations. Some of the most common violations they are seeing are:
      • Transition jacket worn with dresses or during boarding. The transition jacket is not allowed with any of the dresses or during boarding.
      • Noncompliant shoes and boots with Aura dress. Please refer to the shoe standards in the uniform policy guide and reach out to a supervisor or an AFA Uniform Committee Member with any questions before a compliance check.
      • Hoop nose rings. Only a single nose stud, no larger than 2 mm, is allowed.
      • Incorrect pin placement or too many pins. Please see the uniform policy guide for correct pin placement.
      • Quarter-zip, atlas, and aura cardigans, without a shirt or shell under. Aura and atlas cardigans are considered layering pieces and must be worn over the shell or a blue button-up shirt. A quarter zip cardigan can only be worn over a button-up shirt.
    • Management is starting crew check-ins with a focus on premium long-haul, Hawaii, and international flying. Check-ins will focus on multiple job aspects, including uniform compliance. Flight Attendants will be issued three RODs before moving to performance steps. If a uniform violation is not “fixable,” the Flight Attendant may be removed from their trip without pay. 
    • Management will be sending monthly reminders in base newsletters, with varying focuses.
  • Wings:
    • There is a trend of wings breaking and even arriving broken. Please inspect your wings upon receipt and let your supervisor know if any are broken.
    • Flight Attendants are allowed to order four sets of wings each year, each style. Example: you can order four sets of standard wings and four sets of “Committed to Kindness” wings for a total of eight. Wings take a while to be produced and shipped, so order wings as soon as you believe you need them.
    • Not having wings on your outer garment may result in a ROD during a uniform check. If you have wings on order and are waiting for them, let the supervisor know during the check. It will be verified, and a ROD will not be issued.
    • Ordering wings after a ROD is issued, following a uniform check, will not remove the ROD.
    • Wearing the children’s wings from the Flight Attendant Kit is not an allowable substitute, and management will issue a ROD.
    • Wearing the gold wings from previous uniforms will also result in a ROD.
  • Update on Inventory:
    • What items are currently backordered?
      • Pants: Tall modern pants in size 00 tall and 2 are low in stock. Pants ordered with a specific inseam are hemmed at the factory. There is low stock on some inseam lengths; however, unhemmed pants are available in all sizes. If an item says “no stock” on a specific inseam, order the size you need anyway, and Unisync will have an unhemmed pair of pants hemmed to your requested size. 
      • There are also some inventory challenges with short-sleeve Atlas blue shirts.

What The Committee Is Working On

1. Easier Reporting of Quality Concerns: Management is working to add the ability to report quality concerns directly from your IMD in Comply365. We were getting closer; however, with the ongoing merger-related changes, it was pushed down the queue. An update will be provided when the tool is available. 

To ensure issues are addressed until the new IMD feature is available, please submit quality concerns using the Quality Concern Form on Team AAG > Other Resources > Uniforms > Safety & Quality > Quality > Here [AAG SSO required]. This will enable Unisync and the AFA Uniform Committee to track recurring issues. Changes can only be made if the vendor is provided with sufficient data and evidence of quality concerns.

2. Policy and Standards Expectations of the New Uniform: The Committee and management are aware of the challenges ahead as we move forward with the new uniform and a global look. The Committee raised concerns about the expectation that a single workgroup will represent two brands. It was suggested that the design team for the new uniform meet with Crew Planning to discuss how our pairings are currently built and how Reserves are used for last-minute flights.

3. AFA Alaska Uniform Committee Page: The Committee is working to update the AFA Alaska Uniform Committee page with resources to help Flight Attendants, such as the maternity process, sensitivity uniform options, and links to other sites and policies. 

4. New Uniform Wear Testing: The new uniform is still on schedule to launch in Q4 of 2028. The vendor is expected to be selected this month, and the process of developing the first wear test pieces will take place over the summer. The first wear test is expected to start in Q4 2026. The first wear test will focus on multiple fabrics and general fit and design. The following wear tests will narrow down the fabrics and designs and address any issues that come up. 

Management has not yet provided information on how many wear testers will be needed. The Committee appreciates the enthusiasm of the Flight Attendants who have reached out asking to be wear testers. Until we have the details, we cannot anticipate the number of volunteers we will be able to use. Unfortunately, we cannot use everyone who has contacted us, but we will be reaching out in the coming months.

We Want to Hear From You!

Please fill out the Quality Concern Form on the Uniform subsite on TeamAAG with any quality issues. Additionally, you may email your Local Uniform Committee Chairperson.

Do you have other feedback for the committee or items that you’d like brought up with management? Please let us know!  Your Local Uniform Committee is your voice to management. You can find contact information on the Uniform Committee page of the AFA Alaska + Hawaiian website. 

Crew Meal Survey Now Open

This message is for both pre-merger Alaska and Hawaiian Flight Attendants

  • Crew Meal Survey now open, survey will close on Tuesday, May 26 at Noon PT

Your Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) recognizes that nutrition plays a vital role in supporting the well-being and performance of Flight Attendants during the workday. Crew meals can be a component of proper nutrition.

The JNC is committed to ensuring that Flight Attendants receive appropriate meals, especially on longer international routes. The JNC is entrusted with advocating for your interests.  To do that effectively, your input is essential.

Please make your voice heard! We invite you to participate in our Crew Meal Survey. The survey is currently open and will close on Tuesday, May 26 at Noon PT. Take a moment to click the survey link and share your thoughts, so the JNC can accurately understand how you feel crew meals could factor into your nutrition plan and better represent your interests.

To Access the Survey

  • For pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants, enter your PeopleSoft Number
  • For pre-merger Hawaiian Flight Attendants, enter your Employee Number (without leading zeros)

Some important notes:

  • Once the survey is submitted, your responses cannot be edited. Please ensure your selections are final before hitting ‘Submit’.

We encourage you to take the time to participate; an informed and engaged membership is our strongest asset during these negotiations. Thank you for your continued commitment to our collective success. If you have any questions about the survey, please reach out to the JNC at jnc@afaalaska.org.

Navigating Recovery: Understanding FADAP and Other Support Options

If you’ve ever questioned your relationship with drugs or alcohol, it’s important to know that you are not alone, and support is available. Flight Attendants have treatment options designed to address the unique realities of this career.

Note: This video references FAAS (Flight Attendant Addiction Support), which is a program for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants. Pre-merger Hawaiian Flight Attendants have similar support contained in the collective bargaining agreement.

Click here to watch on YouTube ➔

FADAP (Flight Attendant Drug and Alcohol Program)

FADAP is a peer-driven, completely confidential program offered through AFA. Your Local Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Committee can connect you with approved treatment centers that understand Flight Attendant schedules and the specific demands of our job. Treatment costs are handled through your personal insurance.

FAAS (Flight Attendant Addiction Support) – Pre-Merger Alaska

FAAS is a newer partnership between AFA and Alaska Airlines for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants that provides structured support and a pathway to return to work based on your recovery and documentation. This program offers three distinct pathways depending on your situation:

  • Pathway One: For those who come forward early and proactively. This option is fully paid for by Alaska Airlines.
  • Pathway Two: For situations involving layover misconduct. This option is also paid for by Alaska Airlines.
  • Pathway Three: For situations involving a positive DOT test. In this case, the Flight Attendant is responsible for treatment costs.

Similarly, pre-merger Hawaiian Flight Attendants have support for treatment, rehabilitation, and, whenever possible, return to duty under section 20.I.4, 5, and 6 of the collective bargaining agreement. 

Take the First Step

If you or a Flight Attendant you know is struggling, please reach out for a confidential conversation. You can contact your Local EAP/Professional Standards Committee or explore additional resources online:

  • FADAP Information: Visit fadap.org.
  • FAAS Information (pmAS): Find more on the Inflight website under the Administration section.
  • Call Us: Call us anytime for support at (949) 470-0493 or (800) 424-2406

Go In-Depth with Our AFA EAP/Professional Standards Committee Chairpersons

As we wrap up the first week of EAP/Professional Standards Committee Focus Month, we’re excited to share an open conversation that takes you behind the scenes of our support network built for Flight Attendants.

MEC Communications Committee Chairperson Brian Palmer recently sat down with pre-merger Alaska MEC EAP/Professional Standards Committee Chairperson Melanie Buker and Vice Chairperson Elizabeth Dillon to discuss the heart of the Committee and how it serves as a confidential, peer-based resource for all Flight Attendants.

Our AFA EAP/Professional Standards Committee is a comprehensive support system, made up of fellow Flight Attendants (not management), here to help you across your personal and professional life:

  • EAP (Employee Assistance Program): Confidential support for personal assistance, mental health and well-being, substance use concerns, and life changes.
  • CIRP (Critical Incident Response Program): Timely emotional first aid from specially trained peers after serious events.
  • Professional Standards: Confidential, peer-to-peer intervention to informally resolve workplace conflicts and promote professional conduct without involving management or risking discipline.

This video is a great way to see how these three programs come together to support you—both at work and beyond. Take a few minutes to watch the interview and see how this support network is working for you:

Watch The Video On YouTube ➔

Our AFA EAP/Professional Standards Committee is always here for you—whenever you need support. Save our 24/7 confidential phone number and don’t hesitate to reach out.

24/7 Contact Information

Phone: (949) 470-0493 or (800) 424-2406
Email: eap@afaalaska.org
Learn More: afaalaska.org/eap

Grievance Committee Update – 2nd Quarter 2026

This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants

Our Grievance Committee is committed to supporting you by ensuring fair disciplinary procedures and upholding our contractual rights. Our contract guarantees at least 13 arbitration dates each year to address both disciplinary and contractual matters. Termination cases are typically prioritized to help Flight Attendants return to work as soon as possible, but we work diligently to balance these with contractual cases. AFA and management jointly decide which cases proceed to arbitration, considering a range of relevant factors.

The steps of discipline are: confirmation of an oral warning (COW), a written warning (WW), suspension (for a varying number of days), and termination. COWs, WWs, and suspensions remain in a Flight Attendant’s file for 18 months, and then are removed. If a Flight Attendant is in a disciplinary step and commits another violation, the new violation will build upon the previous violation. Management doesn’t always progress through the steps of discipline. If management investigates a Flight Attendant for theft or abuse of sick leave, for example, management will terminate the Flight Attendant if there is evidence to support its findings; if there is no evidence, then the Flight Attendant will most likely be issued a record of discussion (ROD). An ROD is not considered discipline. There is no middle ground for certain violations.  

Many Flight Attendants are under the impression that if they’ve been an overall good employee, have no to low attendance points, good kudos, decent seniority, etc., they will not be disciplined. This is not the case; regardless of any good work qualities one may have, if management believes the Flight Attendant committed an offense, they will be disciplined.

If a supervisor or manager contacts you about a flight, work issue, or disciplinary matter and there is no AFA representative present, clearly state that you would like an AFA Representative to join the call before you continue.

Subject of Most Recent Discipline

  • Sick Leave and FMLA Abuse: Terminations for sick leave and FMLA abuse are increasing, often due to travel audits. Management can see all comments or remarks on posted trip trades and personal drops, even if later deleted. If management finds evidence of abuse, termination will result. Never call in sick unless you are truly too ill or injured to fly. Calling in sick for reasons unrelated to your health, such as to care for a pet, is grounds for termination. If you cannot make it to work and are not sick, and cannot obtain a management drop, a no-show may be the best option.
  • Theft: Removing anything from the aircraft except an opened/used box of water, an unused pilot crew meal, or food you have purchased will lead to termination.
  • Timecard fraud: Examples include intentionally delaying boarding door closure to obtain sit pay. Management has terminated for this violation.
  • Reserve “Roulette”: Not being physically within two hours of base for your Reserve Availability Period (RAP) and calling in sick only once given an assignment. Management considers this a terminable violation. Management regularly reviews the trip trade postings and history related to sick calls, and whether comments and money incentives are added to trips that are subsequently called in sick. Even deleted trade history or postings can be seen by management.
  • Picking up trips when you know you are not legally able to work them.
  • Lying during an investigation
  • Drug/Alcohol violations
  • Offering or awarding passengers frequent flyer points in exchange for kudos or completed credit card applications
  • Harassment
  • Refusing scheduling revisions or ignoring requests to call Crew Scheduling.
  • Reserves Commuting During RAP: Commuting during your Reserve Availability Period (RAP), even if you have self-assigned a trip or are not in base for the full reserve period. Management has issued suspensions or terminated employment depending on the situation.
  • Social Media Violations: This includes sending friend or follow requests to passengers using information obtained from Block2Block.
  • Commuter Violations
    • Flight Attendant released from DHD and used D8Y to travel home
    • Flight Attendant used D8Y to travel to a trip picked up out of base
    • Flight Attendant used D8Y to or from incorrect cities
    • Flight Attendant used D8Y for pleasure travel.
    • Commuter audits are conducted monthly, and usually reveal reserve Flight Attendants who were not in base. 
  • Lost IMD or Other Required Items: If your IMD is stolen, obtain a police report as soon as possible.
  • Failing to complete CBT: even if Flight Attendant just forgets to close the training window (tap the “X” at the top of the screen) to move it from in process to complete.
  • Uniform Issues: Flight Attendants have been removed from duty without pay for uniform non-compliance.
  • Late to Gate or Causing a Flight Delay

Hot Topic: Social Media Discipline

Disciplinary actions related to social media, including terminations, are increasing. Remember, social media pages and accounts—including personal and group pages—are not private. The First Amendment right to free speech protects you from government action, but not from private employers like Alaska Airlines. The company has a social media policy, and arbitrators have upheld that comments made on private pages may be subject to discipline by your employer.

Reminder: Short Sick Calls

Section 32.C.5 of the CBA defines a “Short Sick Call” as calling in sick less than two hours before your scheduled check-in. If you want to avoid receiving 2.5 points for a short sick call, you must contact Crew Scheduling after the scheduled check-in time—not simply after you have checked in yourself, as clarified in Section 32.C.6.

Recent Arbitration/Mediation

April 2025Disciplinary Grievance
May 2025Disciplinary Grievance
May 2025Disciplinary Grievance
June 2025Disciplinary Grievance
July 2025Disciplinary Grievance
August 2025Disciplinary Grievance
September 2025Disciplinary Grievance
October 2025Disciplinary Grievance
November 2025Disciplinary Grievance
January 2026Disciplinary Grievance
February 2026Disciplinary Grievance
March 2026Disciplinary Grievance
April 2026Disciplinary Grievance

Recent Contractual Arbitrations

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-38-24-Violation of §8.M and Grievance Settlement 36-99-2-458-22 Violation of §8.D Check In and Debrief.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §8.M [Hours of Service: Domicile Rest] and Grievance Settlement 36-99-2-458-22 [Violation of §8.D Check In and Debrief], and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when on or around September 23, 2023, the Company refused to allow a Flight Attendant who had operationally-impacted reduced domicile rest (§8.M.2) to utilize the applicable contractual provisions of §8.M, which would have allowed the Flight Attendant to be removed from their subsequent sequence beginning September 24, 2023, without pay pursuant to §8.M.3, due to the domicile rest time between sequences projecting to fall below CFR-required rest. Instead, on the evening of September 23, 2024, Crew Scheduling altered the Flight Attendant’s check-in time for the subsequent sequence (on September 24, 2023) to a later check-in time in violation of §8.M.2, thereby denying them access to their contractual right to be released from the subsequent sequence without pay pursuant to §8.M.3. 

Decision:

Alaska Airlines, Inc., violated Section 8.M of the collective bargaining agreement when the Flight Attendant waived contractual domicile rest and, before their duty period on the first trip ended and the Company changed their report time for the first duty period of the second trip to meet CFR requirements. Alaska Airlines, Inc. shall cease and desist from unilaterally changing a Flight Attendant’s report time for the first duty period of the second trip to meet CFR requirements before the Flight Attendant’s duty period on the first trip has ended where a Flight Attendant has waived contractual domicile rest.

Recent Grievance Settlements

None

Grievances Recently Mediated 

None

Grievances Recently Granted by Management 

None

Grievances Recently Withdrawn

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-22-14-Violation of Required Maternity Leave.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Section 15.D. and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it failed to require Flight Attendants to begin Maternity Leave after the 28th week of pregnancy.   

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-207-20-Violation of §10, §11.D & §24.L Bundled Scheduling Notifications.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §10 [Scheduling], §11.D [Reserve:  Scheduling/Notice of Time to Report] and §24.L [General and Miscellaneous: Company-Provided Inflight Mobile Device (IMD)], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when its Jeppesen Crew Access (JCA) scheduling system sent bundled scheduling notifications to Flight Attendants on their Inflight Mobile Devices (IMDs) or directly in Crew Access, requiring Flight Attendants to batch acknowledge or ignore such notifications and thereby resulting in Flight Attendants potentially waiving multiple contractual protections via an extra-contractual point of contact (i.e. Crew Access scheduling notifications).  

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-384-20-Violation of §10.S Scheduling Notifications.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §10.S [Scheduling :  Pre-Cancellations], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it used non-contractual scheduling notifications sent to Flight Attendants via the Crew Scheduling system in order to communicate and assign alternate flying or an obligation to call Crew Scheduling within a specific window of time.  If a Flight Attendant accepts such non-contractual scheduling notification(s), which is neither contact by Crew Scheduling via Company email nor via primary phone contact as defined in §10.S.1.a, the scheduling notification(s) violates the contract by abrogating the Flight Attendant’s ability to: (1) decline the alternate assignment and waive pay protection (§10.S.2.b), (2) decline the “out of original footprint by more than two hours” alternate assignment and call Crew Scheduling between 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM (local domicile time) the night prior to the start of the original sequence (§10.S.2.c), or (3) waive pay protection and be relieved of any further scheduling obligation (§10.S.3). 

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-386-20-Violation of §8.Q & §8.R Contactability and Notification of Delay or Cancellation.This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §8.Q [Hours of Service: Contactability] and §8.R [Hours of Service: Notification of Delay or Cancellation], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it used non-contractual scheduling notifications sent via the Crew Scheduling system in order to communicate and assign revised flying to Flight Attendants who were off-duty on a remain overnight (RON). Such scheduling notifications are in violation of the contractually defined means of contact and/or the Flight Attendant’s obligation to respond pursuant to these provisions.

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-41-24- Violation of §25.B Safe and Healthy Workplace-B/E Aerospace Coffee Makers.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §25.B [Air Safety, Heath and Security:  Safe and Healthy Workplace] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when on or about February 15, 2024, it refused AFA’s request to discontinue the use of older style B/E Aerospace coffee makers until adequate physical mitigations are put into place to prevent the coffee makers, when coupled with the Company’s new onboard coffee product, from spewing hot coffee and grounds during the brew process, which has previously resulted in the injury of at least ten Flight Attendants.

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-36-20-Violation of §25.B ANC Training Facility.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §25.B [Air Safety, Health and Security: Safe and Healthy Workplace], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it conducted Recurrent Training (RT) drills in Anchorage, Alaska in the Ross Aviation Hanger, and on or about February 16-19, 2020, the external temperature ranged from 18 to 46 degrees Fahrenheit and when the hanger door opened, frequently without notice, the internal hanger temperature dropped to as low as 46 degrees.  After the external hanger door opened it took approximately two hours with a loud heater to get the internal temperature back up to the low to mid 60s.  

Grievances Recently Filed and Awaiting Management Response

None

Grievances Recently Filed and Denied

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-122-25-Violation of §21.T Sit Pay.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §21.T [Compensation: Sit Pay] and §5

[Definitions: Ground Time] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it refused to pay sit pay for the cumulative time between two flights, which is ground time. Normally it is paid from L1 door opening of the prior flight until L1 door closing for the final time from the departing flight; it should be paid regardless of the interim activities before the closing of the L1 door for the final time.

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-255-25- Violation of §8.F Over-Duty Pay and §11.F

Airport Standby.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §8.F [Hours of Service: Over-Duty Pay] and §11.F [Reserve: Airport Standby] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it refused to pyramid the pay rate for a Flight Attendant who sits airport standby (APSB) and is subsequently assigned flying with a duty period that initially exceeds 10:30 (except for those APSB Flight Attendants who accept a 4K) but ultimately goes over-duty, greater than 12:30.

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-256-25– Violation of §8.F Over-Duty Pay and §10.E

Line Construction and Operational Impact.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §8.F [Hours of Service: Over-Duty Pay] and §10.E [Scheduling: Line Construction and Operational Impact] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it refused to pyramid the pay rate of flights, including surface deadheads, for a Flight Attendant whose duty period intrudes into a day off by 15 minutes or more and the trip also extends over-duty, flying over 12:30, in the same duty period.

Grievances Previously Filed, Denied by Management and Currently Awaiting Arbitration Dates

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-55-17-Violation of §21.V Winds Aloft Adjustment of Sit Pay in JCTE.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §21.V [Compensation: “Scheduled” or “Actual” For Minimum Pay Rules (MPRs) and/or Sit Pay], past practice and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when its Jeppesen Crew Access (JCA) trading system displayed each posted trip as a static ‘snapshot’ taken at the time of posting rather than a ‘live’ view, thus denying the Flight Attendant the ability to determine whether a trip is eligible for 1.0 TFP of Sit Pay due to an automated scheduling adjustment (e.g. by the Winds Aloft program).

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-41-19-Violation of §25.D.2 Failing to Notify MEC President and ASHSC of Reconfiguration or Re-design Prior to Final Decision. This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §25.D.2 [Air Safety, Health and Security: Safety Information], past practice and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it failed to notify the MEC President of a decision to reconfigure or re-design the interior of the Airbus aircraft and when it failed to discuss with the ASHSC the parties’ interests and concerns for inflight safety prior to making a final decision on the reconfiguration/re-design. 

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-84-22-Violation of §21.J Ground Delay Pay.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §21.J [Compensation:  Block and Ground Delays], past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it did not pay ground delay pay accumulatively, requiring each delay to go over 11 minutes to be eligible for pay, when a flight (same flight number/same routing) returns to gate one or more times.  

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-176-22-California Family School Partnership Act Violation of Past Practice and Roberts Award.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of past practice, the Roberts Award 36-99-2-49-03, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it unilaterally disallowed the California Family School Partnership Act for those Flight Attendants based in Los Angeles (LAX); then reinstated, with no notice, the state law for LAX based Flight Attendants only, but not for the other California based Flight Attendants in San Diego (SAN) or San Francisco (SFO), and not for the rest of the Flight Attendants based in our system, Seattle (SEA), Portland (PDX) or Anchorage (ANC), in violation of Roberts.

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-215-23-Violation of §10.J.4 Bidding Packet and Bidding Times and Violation of Grievance Settlement 36-99-2-116-18.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §10.J.4 [Scheduling:  Bid Packets and Bidding Timelines], Grievance Settlement 36-99-2-116-18, past practice, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when on or about July 10, 2023, it and/or the NAVBLUE Preferential Bidding System (PBS) vendor did not provide an administrative lock-out function or a mutually agreeable alternate solution to allow for the correction of a technical issue when processing bid awards without opening up the system to all users.   

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-248-23- Violation of §32 and Roberts Decision.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §32 [Attendance], past practice, the Roberts Award 36-99-2-49-03, and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it unilaterally rolled out state leave laws on a state-by-state basis rather than applying the most liberal of state leave laws to all Flight Attendants regardless of domicile, thereby disparately treating Flight Attendants within the Collective Bargaining unit, in violation of Roberts. 

Grievance No.:  36-99-2-170-24-Violation of §15.G Leaves Related to Serious Aircraft/Crewmember/Passenger Incidents (AQ).  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §15.G [Leaves of Absence: Leaves Related to Serious Aircraft/Crewmember/Passenger Incidents] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when on or about August 30, 2024, it refused to allow Flight Attendants the ability to use the above provisions when they had a documented air quality event, as they are requiring the Flight Attendants to file workers’ compensation claims, which are frequently denied.  

Grievance No:  36-99-2-2-25- Violation of §10.Z Personal Drops.  This grievance alleges the Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §10.Z [Scheduling: Personal Drop(s)] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement occurred when, on or about October 10, 2024, it was discovered that Crew Scheduling was processing personal drops incorrectly. Instead of processing the personal drops in seniority order the day prior, as required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement, Crew Scheduling would process them in random time periods throughout the day of operation, skipping over the contractual requirement to process them in seniority order the day prior. This resulted in Crew Scheduling randomly executing first-come, first-served requests based on their staffing needs, thereby circumventing the seniority order provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Grievance No:  36-99-2-73-25-Violation of §8.I Night Rule & 10.DD Long Stage Length Duty Period (“4k”). This grievance alleges t The Company’s violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement §8.I [Hours of Service: Night Rule] and§10.DD [Scheduling: Long Stage Length Duty Period (“4k”)] and all related sections of the Collective Bargaining Agreement when it refused to pay double time (2.0x) for the full duty period on a 4k sequence in which the Flight Attendant is on duty at 4:29 a.m.*, 8:30 a.m.†, and the duty day is ultimately over twelve hours and thirty minutes (12:30), although they currently pay double time (2.0x) on non-4k sequences when the Flight Attendant is on duty at 4:29 a.m.*, 8:30 a.m.†, and the duty day ultimately goes over ten hours and thirty minutes (10:30).

* Local time
† Initial departure station time of the duty period

Register Now: Reserve Webinar – Thursday, August 6

This message is for pre-merger Alaska Flight Attendants As a follow-up to our June 23 save-the-date announcement, we’re excited to share full details and open registration for our August pre-merger Alaska Reserve Webinar! If you’ve ever wondered, “Can they do that?” when Crew Scheduling calls with a reserve assignment or schedule change—whether you’re a Reserve Flight […]

AFA Committee Focus Month: Membership Engagement

July marks our latest AFA Committee Focus Month, and we’re excited to spotlight our Membership Engagement Committee. In May, we kicked off this initiative by showcasing the exceptional work of our EAP/Professional Standards Committee—illustrating how our committees serve and support us every day. Our Membership Engagement Committee is here to make sure every Member feels genuinely […]

Joint Contract Negotiations Session 16 – July 2026

The JNC has been actively negotiating key sections of the contract, focusing on vacation, sick leave, and temporary duty assignments. A tentative agreement was reached on Section 37 (Temporary Duty Assignments), ensuring financial protections and fair treatment for Flight Attendants during temporary assignments. These ongoing discussions demonstrate a commitment to integrating the best benefits from both Alaska and Hawaiian CBAs for all members.

Human Rights & Equity Committee Meeting Recap – 2nd Quarter 2026

On Wednesday, June 24, our AFA Human Rights & Equity Committee Chairpersons met to discuss their ongoing activism to raise awareness and create positive change within our workplace and community. Your representatives attending the meeting were Nyachan Chuar (ANC), Yan Yan Teague (SEA), Aaron Miller (PDX), Trista Vanta (SFO), Louise Borras (LAX-pmAS), Bruni Agosto-Pinal (LAX-pmHA), […]

Inflight Service Committee Meeting Recap – 2nd Quarter 2026

On Thursday, June 11, our AFA Inflight Service Committee Chairpersons met with management to represent our Flight Attendants and advance meaningful improvements in our workplace. Your representatives at the meeting included Naomi Parcell (ANC), Ross DeJong (SEA), Todd Horn (PDX), Raymond Ramirez (SFO), Johanna Thomas (LAX pmAS), Gary Manoi (LAX pmHA), Andrew Malone (SAN), and […]

Recent Posts

News By Month

News By Category

AFA News Now Air Quality Air Safety, Health, & Security Committee (ASHSC) Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) AS/HA Merger AS/VX Merger Benefits Committee Committees Communications Committee Contract Contract 2014 Negotiations Blog Council 15 SAN Council 18 LAX (pmAS) Council 19 SEA (pmAS) Council 30 ANC Council 35 SFO Council 39 PDX Council 43 HNL Council 47 LAX/SEA (pmHA) EAP/Professional Standards Committee Extension 2021 Blog Featured Government Affairs Committee Grievance Committee Hotel Committee Human Rights & Equity Committee Industry News Inflight Service Committee Inflight Training Committee JNC Blog Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) Latest News Local Councils Master Executive Council (MEC) Membership Engagement Committee Message from the MEC President Mobilization Committee Negotiations Pairing Construction Preferential Bidding System (PBS) Press Releases Reserve Committee Retirement Committee Scheduling Committee Uniform Committee

Want To Stay In The Loop?

Stay up-to-date on AFA Alaska + Hawaiian news and information by signing up for our email and text message updates. Click a button below to get started or update your preferences if you're already a subscriber.
Sign Up for Emails
Sign Up for Text Updates